UPDATE, May 2: For the third year in a row, the repeal was denied. Per The Advocate in Baton Rouge, a motion to shelve the measure passed 3-2, likely ending hopes for the bill for the 2013 regular legislative session.
Dear Governor Bobby Jindal,
Today, State Bill 26—designed to repeal Louisiana’s creationism law—will be heard in the state Senate Education Committee. Considering you have called on the Republican Party to “stop being the stupid party,” I encourage you to support it. By supporting the Louisiana Science Education Act (LSEA), our state’s misnamed and misguided creationism law, you are causing this problem, not stopping it.
In an April 12 interview with NBC’s Education Nation, you reiterated your support for the LSEA and for teaching creationism in public schools by saying:
“We have what’s called the Science Education Act, that says if a teacher wants to supplement those materials, if the school board’s OK with that, if the State school board’s OK with that, they can supplement those materials.
“I’ve got no problem if a school board, a local school board, says we want to teach our kids about creationism, that some people have these beliefs as well. Let’s teach them about intelligent design. I think teach them the best science. Let them, give them the tools where they can make up their own mind, not only in science but as they learn and teach about other controversial issues, whether it’s global warming or whether it’s…climate change or these other issues. What are we scared of? Let’s teach our kids the best facts and information that’s out there. Let’s teach them what people believe and let them debate and learn that. We shouldn’t be afraid of exposing our kids to more information, more knowledge. Give them critical thinking skills, and as adults they’ll be able to make their own and best decisions.”
Creationism is not science. It doesn’t meet the basic standards of science and therefore doesn’t belong in public school science classrooms. Science is the way we explain natural phenomena. Scientific explanations can be tested, and these tests can be repeated time and time again and will produce the same results. Creationism is an untestable metaphysical story. Evolution, on the other hand, is a valid scientific theory that meets all the requirements of science.
There is no debate about evolution’s validity among scientists. There is no controversy. There is no disagreement among scientists that students should be asked to evaluate. On the other hand, teaching students that creationism is science wastes their time and undermines their understanding of the scientific method by suggesting that something lacking scientific validity somehow has it. Physicist Laurence Krauss compares teaching creationism to child abuse, and he’s right: education is about overcoming ignorance, not validating it. Teaching creationism will not help our students learn to think critically. To think critically, we must start with a valid set of facts.
Governor Jindal, surely you know from your biology studies at Brown University that the theory of evolution is the “best science.” It is supported by all of the evidence. Evolution is the foundation of all of modern biological science, and of fields like medicine and agriculture. Understanding evolution is what allows us to control pests and develop drugs to kill bacteria.
The only controversy over evolution is one constructed by Louisiana politicians. Louisiana students must be taught evolution so we can compete for cutting edge science and technology jobs in places like the New Orleans BioDistrict or Baton Rouge’s Pennington Biomedical Research Center.
Teaching creationism is not only educational malpractice. It is also illegal. The Supreme Court ruled that teaching creationism in public schools was unconstitutional. Their decision on the 1987 Edwards v. Aguillard case threw out Louisiana’s first creationism law. Governor, we’ve been over this before.









