Dec. 22 marks the 10th anniversary of the repeal of “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell,” the Clinton administration policy that ended the formal ban on gay people serving in the military in 1993 — yet forced them to keep part of themselves hidden until the policy’s repeal in 2011.
Ten years later, LGBT military members still face challenges, including President Donald Trump’s 2019 ban on transgender people serving. But they no longer have to live under DADT. And that’s a beautiful thing for not only the individuals, but the military as a whole, according to Christina Wiskowski, a Comcast employee and Captain in the Air Force.
“I’m so grateful the repeal happened, and our younger generation doesn’t have to deal with this,” Wiskowski, senior manager at Internet Essentials from Comcast, told Know Your Value in an interview. “Maintaining readiness as a force is challenging, and when you have a component that’s unable to bring their true authentic self, it’ll affect their ability to serve fully. [The DADT repeal] meant my military self could be a 100 percent accurate representation of who I am.”
But when she enlisted as an Air Force reservist in 2001, Wiskowski didn’t know DADT would have any effect on her life.
She identified as straight at the time, and at age 20, she was feeling restless following a year of college that didn’t feel like the right path for her. Wiskowski had been planning to go the pre-med route in school, so she enlisted as a medical technician to get experience and see where life took her.
As it turned out, life took her not only on overseas deployments and service with three different military units, but also to Margaretta: the woman she met at age 24 who would become her wife, years later.
“We were friendly for a while, and that relationship turned into something more,” Wiskowski said. “Through that process, growing that relationship, I had a personal revelation about my own identity.”
For Wiskowski, who now identifies as a lesbian, that revelation wasn’t only personal. It affected her professional life too.
“I had a few close friendships in that unit at the time, my first unit, and they knew about my relationship,” Wiskowski said. “I wasn’t concerned about them. But it was at the back of my mind: If it became public knowledge, I didn’t know what that would do socially or administratively for me.”
That unit shut down in 2007, and Wiskowski moved to another from 2007 to 2015 – one that was even more supportive, with a few friends who were “quietly out, but out,” she said. “It was a great experience and put any fears I had at ease … It was business as usual.”
Wiskowski noted that each unit and each wider branch in the military has its own culture, and she feels “incredibly fortunate” to have the experiences that she did. But the safety of her home turf didn’t protect her when she was deployed.
“When you’re deployed, your administrative control is with the home unit, but the operational control is your deployed unit,” Wiskowski explained. “So even if your home unit is supportive, if your deployed unit finds out you’re in violation of a military policy, that can be a problem.”
So, Wiskowski didn’t make calls home to Margaretta in front of people she didn’t know. And Margaretta didn’t have access to any benefits or services – nor would she be notified if Wiskowski were to be injured.
She sought support in an “underground network” of LGBT military members who could relate, but the added stress took a toll, permeating even casual conversations. During her first Afghanistan deployment, in 2009, Wiskowski was working in an air crew position in a squadron that was half made up of people from her home unit and half people she didn’t know.
“One of the guys from my home unit was asking how my now-wife was doing in a way that clearly identified a relationship,” she said. “I kept making eyes at him, like, ‘hey, you’re outing me!’ In the end the [members of the unit] were all pretty supportive, but at the time I had to be on guard.”
That same year, Wiskowski began working as the deputy manager at the Office of Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.). There on Capitol Hill, she had a literal front-row seat to the debates over legislation in Congress – including rumblings about a potential DADT repeal.









