When Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, decided to publicly reverse his stance on marriage equality, he rooted his change of heart in several factors. Some were external, such as the growing support among Americans for marriage equality, and the declining divorce rate since same-sex marriage was introduced nearly a decade ago. Others were internal and more powerful–the love he feels for his son Will, who came out to his parents two years ago.
But arguably the most surprising influence Sen. Portman credited with swaying his position on marriage equality was his faith as a Christian.
“I wrestled with how to reconcile my Christian faith with my desire for Will to have the same opportunities to pursue happiness and fulfillment as his brother and sister,” wrote Portman in an op-ed for the Columbus Dispatch on Friday. “Ultimately, it came down to the Bible’s overarching themes of love and compassion and my belief that we are all children of God.”
Portman’s embrace of marriage equality, the first from a sitting Republican senator, comes at a critical time for the GOP. Grappling with having lost the popular vote in five out of the last six elections, Republican leaders are trying to figure out exactly how to broaden their party’s appeal without compromising the values of their mostly white, Christian base. Portman’s interpretation of the Bible, however, may hold the key to bridging the GOP’s evangelical wing with groups it has traditionally shut out.
“There is a growing group of Christians who believe the Bible has been misinterpreted, and that’s the debate going on right now,” said Justin Lee, founder and executive director of the Gay Christian Network, to msnbc.com. “One interpretation is that [the Bible] condemns gay sex and relationships. Period. End of story. The other interpretation is that these passages are all within specific contexts of rape, idol worship, and pedophilia, and that those behaviors are condemned–rightfully so–but that none of these are depictions of monogamous, loving, committed relationships.”
Lee, who grew up Southern Baptist, used to firmly believe that homosexuality was sinful. But after coming to terms with his own sexuality, Lee learned to accept his identity as both a gay man, and a man of faith. “I’m definitely a religious person,” he said. “My faith was always the most important thing in my life and continues to be, but my views on this particular issue have changed.”
Traditionally, religious conservatives have overwhelmingly opposed the idea of marriage equality. According to a poll from last November by the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, only 19% of white evangelical Protestants (who in the last election made up nearly 40% of the Republican voting bloc) favor same-sex marriage.
What this opposition to marriage equality creates is a major catch-22: the GOP can’t win unless it appeals to more voting demographics (including LGBT voters,) yet becoming more inclusive runs the risk of alienating the very core of the party.
Already, this conflict was on full display at the American conservative Union’s annual conference last week, when Republican leaders sent a split message about which direction their party should head. Some advocated for change, like Kentucky Senator Rand Paul and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, while others preached for more of the same.
“We don’t need a new idea,” said Florida Senator and rising star Marco Rubio during his speech at CPAC on Thursday. “The idea is called America, and it still works.” Rubio reaffirmed his support of “traditional” marriage, and added that his belief “does not make me a bigot.”
Jeb Bush, another potential 2016 contender, argued a different approach. “We’re associated with being anti-everything,” he said on Friday. “Way too many people believe that Republicans are anti-immigrant, anti-woman, anti-science, anti-gay, anti-worker. Many voters are simply unwilling to choose our candidates because those voters feel unloved, unwanted, and unwelcome in our party.”









