Donald Trump didn’t have a strong chance of winning his immunity claim heading into oral arguments Tuesday in Washington, and the argument itself showed why.
Part of the former president’s position is that, to be criminally prosecuted, he needed to have first been convicted by the Senate in his insurrection impeachment trial, but that, because he was acquitted, he therefore can’t be prosecuted now in his federal election interference case.
The argument doesn’t make sense on its face, but its implications were made more dire during the hearing at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Judge Florence Pan pointed out that, under Trump’s theory, a president could order SEAL Team Six to murder the president’s political rivals and, so long as they’re not convicted in an impeachment trial, they’re off the hook. Justice Department lawyer James Pearce similarly observed on behalf of the special counsel that, under Trump’s theory, a president could simply resign to avoid criminal consequence.
Pearce warned of a “frightening future” if Trump’s legal position is correct.
Pearce warned of a “frightening future” if Trump’s legal position is correct.








