“What is the practical effect of Trump pardoning individuals who took efforts to overturn the 2020 election results, given that (to my understanding) none of these individuals was convicted on FEDERAL charges? Are these ‘pardons’ purely theatrics? Or are there practical ramifications of a federal pardon that ameliorate some consequences of these individuals having been found guilty of (or pleading guilty to) STATE charges?” — D.
Hi D.,
The practical effects are limited for the reason you observe. Presidents can only pardon federal crimes, so pardoning people who have only been charged at the state level wouldn’t seem to help them.
Yet even if these 2020 election-related pardons are more symbolic, it’s worth taking stock of what the president is using his power to symbolize.
Recall that he started his second term by ordering blanket clemency and dismissals for Jan. 6 defendants, including people who assaulted law enforcement on that day in 2021. Both that earlier pardon proclamation and this latest one purported to end, in the president’s words, “a grave national injustice that has been perpetrated upon the American people.”
The latest one therefore fits the pattern of Trump attempting to recast himself and his supporters as victims after their failed subversion of the 2020 election, which he lost to Joe Biden. Seeking to airbrush his place in history, the president said in his Jan. 6 proclamation that it “begins a process of national reconciliation,” while the latest one said it “continues” that process.









