Alec Baldwin is mounting some interesting legal arguments in the “Rust” film set shooting case that could cause headaches for New Mexico prosecutors trying to convict the actor of involuntary manslaughter.
For one thing, the actor, who has denied any wrongdoing in cinematographer Halyna Hutchins’ death, is going after the appointment of the special prosecutor in his case, Andrea Reeb, because she’s also a state legislator. His lawyers are making a constitutional argument that Reeb’s role oversteps the separation of powers and so she must be disqualified. “The legal question is not a close one,” Baldwin’s lawyers wrote in a motion filed last week.
I’m not as confident as the Baldwin legal team about that, because they note that New Mexico courts haven’t ruled on the issue. So it’s at least an open question, even though his argument has some broadly intuitive appeal. But given the unprecedented nature of the question, it’s one that could be subject to extensive pretrial litigation however it’s resolved.
On the subject of pretrial litigation, Baldwin’s team has thrown another big argument out there, separate from the special prosecutor issue. It’s claiming that prosecutors shouldn’t be able to use the firearm enhancement that carries a five-year penalty upon conviction because the enhancement charge was different when the alleged crime occurred in 2021. According to the defense filing, the version of the law that existed when the shooting occurred required a showing of intent to injure or intimidate someone in brandishing a firearm. However, the newer version, enacted last May, doesn’t require that level of intent.
Of course, both the U.S. and the New Mexico constitutions outlaw what are called “ex post facto” punishments, or ones that make conduct illegal after the fact. Simply put, we don’t want people punished for things that weren’t illegal at the time they happened. So while knocking out that gun charge enhancement wouldn’t result in dismissing the case against Baldwin, it could take the most significant potential prison time against him off the table. I previously noted the uphill battle prosecutors may face in trying to convict Baldwin, and that a trial, if one happens, could come down to a battle of the experts over what’s required on film sets. These latest filings from Baldwin suggest prosecutors have some work to do before they get to that point, as both defense arguments risk the government losing what it no doubt sees as important tools at its disposal ahead of a trial.
Jordan Rubin is the Deadline: Legal Blog writer. He was a prosecutor for the New York County District Attorney’s Office in Manhattan and is the author of “Bizarro," a book about the secret war on synthetic drugs. Before he joined MS NOW, he was a legal reporter for Bloomberg Law.
Latest Post
Recommended
