updated 5:15 p.m.
With jobless aid poised to expire for 1.3 million Americans this weekend, a bipartisan team of senators is proposing a short-term extension of unemployment benefits that will come to the floor as soon as Congress returns in January 2014.
Sens. Jack Reed, a Rhode Island Democrat, and Dean Heller, a Nevada Republican, are proposing a bill that would extend unemployment benefits for three months.
“To cut it off this way is both wrong from a principle, what we should stand for as a nation, and from a very sound, practical economic perspective,” Reed said on a Thursday conference call.
The $6 billion proposal proposes to maintain aid for the long-term unemployed, who would have their benefits restored retroactively, while buying legislators more time to work out a longer extension. The legislation is expected to come to the Senate floor on Jan. 6, Reed said.
“My job search is my full time job. I’m sick and tired of people insinuating that folks in my situation are not looking for jobs,” said Deborah Barrett, a 57-year-old accounting professional from Rhode Island who has been out of work since February. Barrett, who was on the conference call with Reed, takes care of her elderly mother and doesn’t know how she’ll continue to support her family after her federal benefits expire this weekend. “I will do whatever I have to do—it’s petrifying,” she said.
Most Republicans oppose the extension of federal benefits—which kick in after state jobless aid expires—arguing that they increase dependency on the government and are unnecessary since the job market has improved .”Does it make sense for our country to borrow money from China to give it to the unemployed in America? That is weakening us as a country,” Sen. Rand Paul told NBC News.
A poll from Hart Research Associates, a Democratic polling firm, showed that extending the jobless benefits is broadly popular. About 55% want Congress to continue them, while about 33% agree they should be allowed to expire, according to the survey, commissioned by the National Employment Law Project, an advocacy group.
During the negotiations over the budget deal, which President Obama signed on Thursday, House Speaker John Boehner said that he would be willing to consider an extension of unemployment benefits, provided that it was paid for. But the provision did not make it into the deal worked out by Sen. Patty Murray and Rep. Paul Ryan, with Democrats resigned to resuming the fight in 2014.
The Reed-Heller proposal does not include offsets. Rep. Sandy Levin, the highest-ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee, said the emergency nature of the benefits should make payfors unnecessary. With 1.3 million losing their benefits immediately, and another 1.9 million in the following six months, “that’s like being hit by an economic hurricane,” Levin said on the conference call. “That’s the reason why in the past, there hasn’t been a payfor.”









