The Supreme Court sided with the firearms industry in ruling that Mexico’s novel lawsuit didn’t plausibly allege that gun companies had aided and abetted unlawful sales routing guns to Mexican drug cartels.
“In asserting that the manufacturers intentionally supply guns to bad-apple dealers, Mexico never confronts that the manufacturers do not directly supply any dealers, bad-apple or otherwise,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote for a unanimous court.
Mexico had sued seven U.S. firearm manufacturers and a distributor for allegedly aiding and abetting illegal sales, arguing that the companies intentionally facilitated unlawful trafficking of their firearms across the southern border, supplying a demand by Mexican drug cartels that seek out American-made military-style weapons.
But the companies argued that Mexico’s legal theory was too far-fetched. “Indeed, if Mexico is right, then every law enforcement organization in America has missed the largest criminal conspiracy in history operating right under their nose, and Budweiser is liable for every accident caused by underage drinkers since it knows that teenagers will buy beer, drive drunk, and crash,” argued Noel Francisco, a former solicitor general under Donald Trump, to the justices on behalf of the industry in March.








