President Obama responded to critics who called him an “imperial president” and a “dictator” for his plans to exercise his executive powers.
“I don’t think that’s very serious,” Obama told CNN‘s Jake Tapper. “I mean, the truth of the matter is, is that every president engages in executive actions. In fact, we’ve been very disciplined and sparing in terms of the executive actions that we have taken.”
On the night of the president’s State of the Union address, several congressional Republicans responded to the president’s promise to act – with or without Congress – by calling him everything from a “dictator” to a ”Kommandant-In-Chef [sic].” Sen. Ted Cruz accused Obama of behaving like an “imperial president.” Rep. Michele Bachmann said he thought he was a “king” and that she planned to sue him.
“We make sure that we’re doing it within the authority that we have under statute,” the president said in the CNN interview, taped Thursday. “But I am not going to make an apology for saying that if I can help middle class families and folks who are working hard to try to get in the middle class do a little bit better, then I’m going to do it.”
The president’s assertion that he has taken “disciplined and sparing” approach to executive action is grounded in cold hard data. MaddowBlog’s Steve Benen used data from the American Presidency Project to calculate the annual average of executive orders for all the presidents since the beginning of the 20th century. Obama turns out not just to rank average in comparison to his predecessors. He ranks dead last. The same data shows that presidents have made less use of that particular tool in recent decades, but Obama still has used fewer than any, issuing a mere 168 executive orders in his first five years.









