The Rubio Paradox
After his strong debate performances, after the endorsements he’s picked up and after Jeb Bush’s weakened position, Marco Rubio looks to be the Republican frontrunner — at least in the “establishment” bracket of the GOP race. And there’s the emerging perception that, if the early contests started tomorrow, Rubio would be the odds-on favorite to win the Republican nomination. But here’s what gives us a little pause: Is he built to win in either Iowa or New Hampshire? Remember, in this modern political era, every GOP nominee has won EITHER Iowa or New Hampshire. Right now, he’s standing in third place in public polling in both states – behind both Trump and Carson.
Here was the view of Rubio’s Iowa presence a month ago: “I’ve seen other campaigns be much more active and much more aggressive,” Polk County Republican Party chairman Will Rogers told NBC’s Danny Freeman and Vaughn Hillyard. “After the debate, people realized he is presidential. But I just don’t fully know or understand what the Rubio strategy is for Iowa.” And when it comes to New Hampshire, consider that the recent GOP winners there have either had geographical ties (Romney) or appeal with independents (McCain, Buchanan).
Is the newly perceived frontrunner built to win in either Iowa or New Hampshire?
Of course, it’s more than possible that this newfound perception of Rubio creates momentum for him to surge ahead and win in either Iowa or New Hampshire (our NBC team in the two states says there’s evidence that his organization is getting stronger). What’s more, given the size of the GOP field, the winning percentage in Iowa or New Hampshire doesn’t have to be big. And as it stands right now, Rubio seems to be well-positioned in some other early states (Nevada, South Carolina). But here’s the question everyone should ask themselves: Can Rubio fall short in both Iowa and New Hampshire and still win the GOP nomination?
Cruz hits GOP field — including Rubio — on immigration
And when it comes to Rubio playing in Iowa and New Hampshire, remember that immigration is still a potent issue in both states – with majorities of Republicans in both states less likely to vote for a candidate who supports a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. And here was Ted Cruz raising the issue yesterday: “[On Tuesday night], you listened to one Republican after another who said, ‘Gosh, it would be mean to enforce our immigration laws,’” Cruz said yesterday in New Hampshire, per MSNBC’s Benjy Sarlin. “And I would point out, by the way, everyone talks about how compassionate it is to grant amnesty to 12 million people here illegally. They’re very compassionate, but it’s not very compassionate if I say, ‘I’m going to give away your job.’ That’s the opposite of compassion.”
Asked by Sarlin how Cruz distinguished himself on immigration from Rubio, the Texas senator responded, “It is not complicated that on the seminal fight over amnesty in Congress, the Gang of Eight bill that was the brainchild of Chuck Schumer and Barack Obama, that would have granted amnesty to 12 million people here illegally, that I stood with the American people and led the fight to defeat it in the United States Congress,” Cruz said. Translation from Cruz: Rubio was a Gang of Eight author, while he was against it.
Tapping the brakes a bit on Cruz vs. Rubio
While we wrote yesterday morning about the coming Cruz vs. Rubio clash, and while others are writing about it today, let’s tap the brakes a bit on this showdown: Rubio needs to find an early state to win (as we mentioned above), and Cruz still has two outsiders ahead of him (Trump and Carson).
Carson accepts the premise of a third American Iraq war
Speaking of one of those outsiders, Ben Carson seemed to accept the premise of a THIRD American war in Iraq during an interview with NBC affiliate WWBT, per NBC’s Emily Gold. “I think we would require boots on the ground [against ISIS],” Carson said. “And the advantage of putting boots on the ground is that you provide leadership, because all the nations of the Arabian Peninsula and in that area, they have an interest in that area. But there’s nobody leading them, so we’re calling for a coalition to form to fight ISIS but there’s nobody to lead it so it’s not forming.”









