The conservative movement is leaving no stone unturned in its quest to marginalize LGBTQ people.
That explains the intensifying dispute between conservative state attorneys general and the Biden administration over — of all things — lunch.
Back in May, the Department of Agriculture announced the Biden administration would interpret constitutional protections against gender discrimination, known as Title IX, to include gender identity and sexual orientation. The announcement advised schools to “investigate allegations of discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation,” and it warned schools that fail to protect LGBTQ students from disparate treatment run the risk of losing funding for their school nutrition programs.
This policy requires schools treat LGBTQ students like other students — nothing more, nothing less.
But Republicans have spent much of the past two years arguing that such anti-discrimination policies trample on their religious freedoms. Nearly two dozen state attorneys general have signed on to a lawsuit contending states should still receive funding for school food programs if they’re found to have permitted anti-LGBTQ discrimination against students. To make this claim, the attorneys say the Biden administration’s Title IX guidance is nonbinding because it didn’t receive public input, and they claim the administration is misinterpreting a 2020 Supreme Court ruling that affirmed anti-discrimination protections for LGBTQ people.
Multiple attorneys general used their press releases announcing the lawsuit to push transphobic rhetoric. Oklahoma Attorney General John O’Connor got dramatic with it, claiming the policy amounts to a “radical” and “pro-transgender agenda.” He called the policy “another example of Biden bullying Americans by attacking our children,” an especially odd choice of words given the policy is literally meant to prevent trans kids from being attacked and bullied.








