Tuesday evening, Mark Sanford won a House seat in a very Republican district. It’s a big turnaround for Sanford, who famously disappeared for six days during his governorship to have an affair with a woman in Argentina. Sanford was censured and fined, and many said his political career was over.
Well today, I’d like to welcome Mark Sanford back to politics. Seriously.
Sanford just beat the politics of sexual puritanism. His victory is another setback for the idea that we should run politicians out of office based on their personal lives and sexual activity. Of course, it’s an argument that’s applied selectively and often hypocritically especially by Republicans.
While affairs are as old as marriage, the rise of sexual puritanism is relatively recent in American politics.
One turning point came in the 1988 presidential race, when Gary Hart’s campaign was torpedoed after reports of his affair. Some debated whether the topic was fair game for the press, but by 1992, obsessing over Bill Clinton’s sex life was commonplace.
The voters decided to elect Clinton anyway, but that didn’t stop the trend. Republicans impeached Clinton over an affair.
There may be no better description of that ridiculous period than Phillip Roth’s account in “The Human Stain”–when the country went on “an enormous piety binge,” giving in to “its most treacherous and subversive pleasure, the Ecstasy of Sanctimony.” The Congress and the press, Roth wrote, gleefully enacted “the astringent rituals of purification that would excise the erection from the executive branch.”
After Clinton there were other Democrats blasted for bad sex and bad judgment, from Eliot Spitzer to Anthony Weiner. There were Republicans exposed for hypocritically backing impeachment while conducting their own affairs — like Newt Gingrich and Bob Livingston — and Republicans linked to prostitution, like David Vitter –and to gay affairs, like Larry Craig.









