One of the worst things you can do if you hit an icy patch on the road is overcorrect. But that’s exactly what some of the country’s most high-profile Republicans seem to be doing in response to the complete loss of the Latino vote this election. They’re spinning the wheel on immigration reform, hoping to skid out of demographic danger.
By now you’ve probably heard President Obama won 71% of the Latino vote. Romney got 27%. The Republicans know they need to do better to win those votes.
Just 2 hours after Mitt Romney delivered his concession speech Tuesday night, Florida Senator Marco Rubio (R) made a plea for Republicans to “work harder than ever to communicate [their] beliefs” to the minority and immigrant communities.
That could be an uphill battle. This isn’t the first election in which the majority of the Latino vote went to the Democrats. President Bill Clinton did even better than President Obama. Clinton won 72% of the Hispanic vote in 1996. In other words, this election result is not a new demographic trend.
Just in the last few days, Republicans like Sens. Lindsey Graham and John McCain have announced their commitment to reforming immigration laws. House Speaker John Boehner said the day after the election that he wants to find “common ground.”
Sean Hannity, Charles Krauthammer, former Gov. Haley Barbour, Larry Kudlow and Rupert Murdoch have all voiced a renewed sense of open-mindedness on immigration.
But this is a pretty serious overcorrection for a few reasons:
1. Are Republicans like Graham and McCain ready to sacrifice immigration policy that was clearly codified in their own party’s platform?
2. How will the Republican base react to a softer approach?
3. Will moderation on immigration reform actually win over Latino voters?









