After Senate Democrats voted Thursday to move forward with the “nuclear option” to push through judicial appointments, Republicans are in uproar — clamoring that Democrats are turning the Senate into the partisan and gridlocked House.
“The Senate in our system was the example to the world that there was a way in democracy to protect minority rights,” Republican Roy Blunt of Missouri said on Friday’s The Daily Rundown. “To a great extent, that’s now lost on these nominations.”
Under the controversial rule change, federal judicial nominees and executive-office appointments can advance to confirmation votes with a simple majority of senators, rather than the traditional 60-vote supermajority.
Blunt, who formerly served as a chief deputy whip in the House, criticized the legislation, saying the Senate has already become too much like the House with “a one person rules committee.”
“That is not the way the Senate should work, nor the way our system serves as an example to the world of how democracy can work with minorities still being respected,” he said.
Since Obama assumed the presidency, however, Republicans in the minority have drastically increased their use of the filibuster to block Democrats’ proposed legislation.
In President Obama’s five years in office, 79 of his nominations have faced at least one vote to end cloture, which is usually held to end a filibuster. That’s compared to only 38 such votes for President Bush’s nominees during his two terms.
As a result, Democrats say they hope going nuclear will help restore what has become an inefficient and unproductive Congress when it comes to presidential nominations. If the Senate has become more partisan like the House, it’s the GOP’s fault, they argue.









