Attorney General Bill Barr was a controversial choice for the post before Senate Republicans confirmed him, but many of his critics’ chief concerns have since been confirmed.
Everything the public has learned of late suggests Donald Trump’s handpicked AG presented a misleading account of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s findings — to Mueller’s great frustration — and even offered less-than-accurate congressional testimony on the subject.
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said on MSNBC this morning, “There’s no doubt that the Attorney General has done more to compromise America’s faith in the attorney general’s office than any other attorney general in my lifetime.” Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) added late yesterday, “Mr. Barr should never have been confirmed in the first place. At this point he has lost all credibility.”
These are hardly unreasonable assessments, though it leads to a fairly obvious question: what exactly are lawmakers prepared to do about it? If Barr has effectively positioned himself as an extension of the White House’s political operation, and the attorney general prefers to act as the president’s lawyer instead of the people’s lawyer, what’s the appropriate remedy?
A DOJ investigation is one option …









