House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan’s (R-Wis.) Medicare plan really isn’t popular. The proposal, which involves scrapping the existing system and replacing it with a voucher scheme, has been rejected repeatedly by American voters, and for good reason — it’s an awful idea.
But Ryan doesn’t care. Even after Republican losses last year, and despite his own defeat in his bid for national office, the right-wing congressman is still pushing his wildly unpopular Medicare plan, despite the fact that the American mainstream, the Senate majority, and even some of his own Republican colleagues don’t want it.
But there he was on Fox News yesterday, telling Chris Wallace his voucher plan isn’t a voucher plan.
“[I]t’s not a voucher. It’s premium support. Those are very different. A voucher is you go to your mailbox, you get a check and you go buy something. That’s not what we are saying.”
Look, I realize the semantics debate can get tiresome, and some Republican pollster no doubt told Ryan that “voucher” didn’t test well with focus groups.
But under the Wisconsinite’s plan, seniors would no longer receive a guaranteed Medicare benefit. Instead, they would enter the private marketplace with a government subsidy.
Most people refer to that subsidy as a voucher. Heck, Paul Ryan himself used to refer to the subsidy as a voucher before the pollsters told him not to. And as the debate gets underway once more, the far-right congressman now wants to change the terms of the debate? There’s no reason for anyone to play along.
Ryan added in the same interview, “I would argue against your premise that we lost this issue during the campaign: We won the senior vote.”
I’ve never fully understood why so many people in media consider Ryan to be one of Washington’s sharper minds, and with comments like these, it’s even more difficult.









