The lede in the New York Times’ report on Donald Trump’s press conference yesterday reads like a dystopian nightmare.
President Trump buoyed the white nationalist movement on Tuesday as no president has done in generations — equating activists protesting racism with the neo-Nazis and white supremacists who rampaged in Charlottesville, Va., over the weekend.
Never has he gone as far in defending their actions as he did during a wild, street-corner shouting match of a news conference in the gilded lobby of Trump Tower, angrily asserting that so-called alt-left activists were just as responsible for the bloody confrontation as marchers brandishing swastikas, Confederate battle flags, anti-Semitic banners and “Trump/Pence” signs.
This is the world we live in now — one in which a sitting president of the United States publicly praises racist activists as “very fine people” who’ve been treated “unfairly” by journalists.
It’s a moment of national shame, but it’s also the basis for a challenge to Donald Trump’s partisan allies: what exactly does the Republican Party intend to do with its president in the face of such a scandal?
Steve Schmidt, a longtime GOP strategist, said on the show last night that this is “a seminal moment” for the party. “There can be no equivocation here; the moral failure is complete and it’s almost irredeemable,” Schmidt explained. “The Republican leaders have to condemn the president for this false equivocation directly by name. They have to censure him, or they risk sliding into a moral abyss with him.” He added that this issue forces “a moral reckoning.”
And yet, no one can say with confidence what, if anything, will happen.
We’ve all seen and heard reports for months that, behind the scenes, GOP officials recognize that Trump is simply unfit for office, but they remain publicly supportive anyway — in part as a result of partisan pressure, in part out of fear of a backlash from the party’s radicalized base.
Is there a line, however, that even Republicans concede the president cannot cross? Is Trump’s willingness to draw a moral equivalence between white supremacists and opponents of white supremacists sufficient?









