About six months ago, following a series of White House embarrassments, the Washington Post‘s Catherine Rampell made a compelling case that “the key members of Trump’s economic brain trust … do not exactly inspire confidence.” The headline on Rampell’s piece read, “Trump’s economic team needs to grow up — fast.”
At the time, her piece was principally focused on Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow, both of whom have struggled through a series of missteps, failed predictions, obvious falsehoods, and strange economic assessments.
But they’re not alone. Kevin Hassett, chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, delivered a presentation in the press briefing room yesterday, and as Slate‘s Jordan Weissmann explained, Hassett’s pitch was at times “baffling.”
Monday, the White House tried to present a counterargument [to Barack Obama’s recent statements about when the current economic expansion began], without exactly admitting it. Council of Economic Advisers Chair Kevin Hassett stopped by the daily White House press briefing to present a series of charts that supposedly demonstrate how the economy improved after Trump was elected. “We were prepared to do this briefing a few weeks ago and there’s not in any way a timing that’s related to president Obama’s Friday remarks,” Hassett told reporters.
This was not particularly convincing. Nor was the case Hassett laid out, in which he used some oddly misleading charts to try and prove that several economic trends improved sharply after Trump was elected.
Weissman did a nice job going point by point — with charts — highlighting Hassett’s misleading rhetoric and tortured efforts to prove that Trump is responsible for an economic “turnaround” that the White House is irresponsibly exaggerating.
I’ve seen some suggestions that Hassett’s presentation was little more than a campaign event from the press briefing room, and while there’s certainly some truth to that, I think in some ways it was worse than that. It struck me as an attempt from a conservative economist, unconcerned with his reputation, to make a president feel better about himself.









