From a progressive perspective, it’s generally best to break up Donald Trump’s judicial nominees into different categories. Some are “disappointing.” Others are “offensive.”
A few, however, fall into the “you’ve-got-to-be-kidding-me” grouping. Take Justin Walker, for example.
By most measures, Walker is a cartoonish caricature of the kind of conservative that Republicans are desperate to put on the federal bench. When the Senate’s GOP majority confirmed him to a district court seat last year, he was a 37-year-old professor who’d never tried a case. Walker was, however, a longtime ally of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and as a former as speechwriter for Donald Rumsfeld. Just as importantly, Walker clerked for Brett Kavanaugh, and served as one of his most ardent champions during the Supreme Court justice’s confirmation fight.
The American Bar Association deemed the young conservative “not qualified.” Senate Republicans didn’t care.
Earlier this month, as Walker was just getting settled in as a district court judge in Kentucky, Republicans decided it was time for him to come back to the nation’s capital — as a nominee for the powerful U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, widely recognized as the nation’s second most powerful federal bench.
It’s a tough nomination to defend. Walker is not qualified; he’s made little effort to hide his partisan zeal; and he hasn’t exactly proven himself as a great jurist during his extraordinarily brief tenure as a district court judge.
Opponents of his nomination can take at least some solace in knowing that Walker can’t be rushed onto the appellate bench too quickly, right? It’s not like Senate Republicans are going to prioritize his confirmation during a deadly pandemic, right?
Wrong. Politico reported yesterday:









