Leading Republican voices responded to the shooting death of conservative activist Charlie Kirk in a wide variety of ways, but Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent managed to break new ground this week when he compared the slaying to the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
“Charlie’s death is like a domestic 9/11,” Bessent said on a podcast. “Just as after 9/11 and Osama bin Laden, the ultimate culprit, was captured, we are operationalizing the Treasury, and we are going to track down who is responsible for this.” The secretary added that his Cabinet agency has “started to compile lists, put together networks.”
Putting aside the question about the propriety of the comparison, what was especially notable about Bessent’s comments was the scope of his plan. As the Treasury chief sees it, the Kirk case isn’t just a matter for law enforcement, as prosecutors move forward with their criminal case against a suspected gunman. Rather, to hear the secretary tell it, this shooting offers the Trump administration an opportunity to launch a massive and coordinated offensive against “networks” of foes.
Who’s the foe in this instance? Bessent didn’t say, exactly, but the administration has made little secret of its intention to go after the left with a vengeance. A TPM report added, “The remarks are the clearest statement yet from a senior Trump official that the administration intends to use the aftermath of Kirk’s assassination as a pretext to investigate and, potentially, charge progressive advocacy groups.”
Soon after, on the same podcast, JD Vance declared, “Political violence, it’s just a statistical fact that it’s a bigger problem on the left.” The vice president was, of course, brazenly lying: There’s overwhelming statistical evidence that proves the opposite is true.
But while it is certainly a problem that the Ohio Republican was peddling demonstrable nonsense, what matters more is how Vance and his colleagues intend to apply their nonsense. The Daily Beast reported:








