In the wake of his latest failed hearing, and confronting intensifying criticisms from his own GOP colleagues, the question isn’t whether House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer will continue with his impeachment crusade fiasco. Rather, the question is what the Kentucky Republican intends to do now that the fiasco has failed.
Last week, the congressman subtly raised a white flag, arguing that the “best path” for his inquiry would be to refer his findings to the Justice Department, as an alternative to pursuing an impeachment vote that would inevitably face bipartisan opposition. He soon after articulated this surrender strategy more explicitly — oddly enough, in a fundraising appeal — leaving little doubt that the process was limping toward a finish line.
It was against this backdrop that Comer — who has spent roughly as much time talking about his crusade on conservative media as he has actually investigating — appeared on a Fox News radio show and again made clear just how weak his case against President Joe Biden really is.
But as part of the same interview, as NBC News reported, Comer was pressed on why news outlets have reported that his committee has turned up no concrete evidence of wrongdoing and whether Attorney General Merrick Garland is seeking to protect Biden. And that’s when things got a little weird.








