Partway through the third Republican presidential primary debate, Sen. Tim Scott was asked about his vision for a path forward on abortion policy. “Well, I’m 100% pro-life; I have a 100% pro-life voting record,” the South Carolinian said. “I would certainly, as president of the United States, have a 15-week national limit.”
What about states that wanted to go in a more progressive direction? Scott endorsed a federal policy that would prevent these states from implementing reproductive rights proposals he deemed “unethical and immoral.”
"I would certainly as president have a 15-week national limit," Tim Scott says on a proposed abortion ban. https://t.co/nTB3jV5aJ0 pic.twitter.com/2nlLzxAddw
— NBC News (@NBCNews) November 9, 2023
At the same event, Vivek Ramaswamy condemned the abortion rights measure Ohio voters added to the state constitution a day earlier. “It was my home state of Ohio, I’m upset about this, yesterday, that passed a constitutional amendment that now effectively codifies a right to abortion all the way up to the time of birth without parental consent,” the GOP entrepreneur claimed.
His description wasn’t accurate, but it was emblematic of a larger truth: Republicans heard what voters had to say in the 2023 election cycle, but many in the party still aren’t listening. HuffPost reported:
Congressional Republicans aren’t giving up on efforts to pass legislation sharply limiting abortion nationwide despite their party’s losses in Tuesday’s elections, which saw Democrats notching huge victories for abortion rights. Staunchly anti-abortion lawmakers argued that the GOP needs to work even harder to persuade voters of their cause and redouble their efforts to pass a ban on abortion after 15 weeks at a minimum.
Republican Sen. J.D. Vance of Ohio told reporters, “We can’t give in to the idea that the federal Congress has no role in this matter because if it doesn’t, then the pro-life movement is basically not going to exist, I think, for the next couple of years.








