Republican Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona has long been in an awkward position. Ahead of his re-election bid in an increasingly competitive state, in which there’s already a very credible Democratic challenger, Flake has managed to offend nearly every relevant constituency simultaneously.
On the left, the Republican senator has been an unyielding partisan, voting with the White House roughly 92% of the time, and refusing to play a meaningful and constructive role in the major policy debates of the day. On the right, Flake is a back-stabbing turncoat who’s publicly feuded with Donald Trump.
Indeed, the senator began clashing with Trump months before the election — after which the GOP president began taking steps to derail Flake’s career.
As it turns out, that won’t be necessary. As the Arizona Republic reported, Flake has decided to retire when his first term ends at the end of this Congress.
Flake said he has not “soured on the Senate” and loves the institution, but that as a traditional, libertarian-leaning conservative Republican he is out of step with today’s Trump-dominated GOP. “This spell will pass, but not by next year,” Flake said. […]
“Here’s the bottom line: The path that I would have to travel to get the Republican nomination is a path I’m not willing to take, and that I can’t in good conscience take,” Flake told The Republic in a telephone interview. “It would require me to believe in positions I don’t hold on such issues as trade and immigration and it would require me to condone behavior that I cannot condone.”
And while there are multiple angles to consider — how this will change the race in Arizona, who may or may not run in the open-seat contest, what Flake’s future plans may entail, etc. — what matters most today is the motivation behind Flake’s decision.
The senator spoke from the chamber floor this afternoon, making his retirement decision official, and describing this as a time “when we must risk our careers in favor of our principles.”
“It must also be said that I rise today with no small measure of regret. Regret, because of the state of our disunion, regret because of the disrepair and destructiveness of our politics, regret because of the indecency of our discourse, regret because of the coarseness of our leadership, regret for the compromise of our moral authority, and by our — all of our — complicity in this alarming and dangerous state of affairs. It is time for our complicity and our accommodation of the unacceptable to end.
“In this century, a new phrase has entered the language to describe the accommodation of a new and undesirable order — that phrase being ‘the new normal.’ But we must never adjust to the present coarseness of our national dialogue — with the tone set at the top.
“We must never regard as ‘normal’ the regular and casual undermining of our democratic norms and ideals. We must never meekly accept the daily sundering of our country — the personal attacks, the threats against principles, freedoms, and institutions, the flagrant disregard for truth or decency, the reckless provocations, most often for the pettiest and most personal reasons, reasons having nothing whatsoever to do with the fortunes of the people that we have all been elected to serve.
“None of these appalling features of our current politics should ever be regarded as normal. We must never allow ourselves to lapse into thinking that this is just the way things are now. If we simply become inured to this condition, thinking that this is just politics as usual, then heaven help us. Without fear of the consequences, and without consideration of the rules of what is politically safe or palatable, we must stop pretending that the degradation of our politics and the conduct of some in our executive branch are normal. They are not normal.









