Before formally launching his political career, Donald Trump took a keen interest in the presidential daily intelligence briefing. In fact, as regular readers may recall, in 2014, he seemed convinced that Barack Obama wasn’t taking the national-security briefings as seriously as he should.
“Fact — Obama does not read his intelligence briefings,” Trump complained, making up details that were in no way factual. Around the same time, Trump added, “Obama has missed 58% of his intelligence briefings” – which, again, was completely untrue.
All of this seemed quite ironic when, during Trump’s presidential transition process, he skipped nearly all of his intelligence briefings. Asked why, the Republican told Fox News in December 2016, “Well, I get it when I need it…. I don’t have to be told — you know, I’m, like, a smart person.”
Many hoped Trump would adopt a more responsible posture once in office, but NBC News reports today that the president isn’t just skipping the daily intelligence summary prepared for him, he’s also participating in “relatively few in-person briefings from his spy agencies.”
A series of recently published presidential schedules show that he has been in just 17 intelligence briefings over the last 85 days. That’s about the same frequency as two of his predecessors, Barack Obama and Bill Clinton, according to a former CIA briefer who has written a book on the subject.
But unlike those former presidents, Trump does not regularly read the written intelligence briefing sent over each day to the White House, U.S. officials tell NBC News, and in private he frequently questions the integrity and judgment of the intelligence officials who are giving him secret information.
The NBC News report added that it’s “extremely difficult” to dissuade the Republican president from believing something he shouldn’t, even with a mountain of evidence, once he’s convinced himself that he’s right.
This comes on the heels of a brutal Time magazine report on Trump’s indifference toward U.S. intelligence findings, and the dangers posed by his “willful ignorance.” In some cases, the article noted, American intelligence professionals have been warned not to provide Trump with intelligence assessments that “contradict stances he has taken in public.”









