As problematic as Donald Trump’s appointment of Matt Whitaker as acting attorney general was two weeks ago, it’s become progressively more bizarre practically every day since.
The Washington Post moved the ball forward overnight, reporting on the Republican lawyer’s principal source of income in the years before his arrival in D.C.
In the three years after he arrived in Washington in 2014, Matthew G. Whitaker received more than $1.2 million as the leader of a charity that reported having no other employees, some of the best pay of his career.
The Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust described itself as a new watchdog nonprofit dedicated to exposing unethical conduct by public officials. For Whitaker, it became a lucrative steppingstone in a swift rise from a modest law practice in Iowa to the nation’s top law enforcement job. As FACT’s president, he regularly appeared on radio and television, often to skewer liberals.
If you’ve never heard of the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust, there’s a good reason for that: it’s maintained a low profile. One former FACT board member told the Post that the tax-exempt group, which changed its name several times and at one point listed its address as a UPS Store in Virginia, “only existed on paper.”
Marcus Owens, who oversaw the IRS’s exempt-organizations division for a decade, added that in its first years, the non-profit group appears to have been a “shell charity” that “was not utilized and remained on the shelf” until Whitaker took the reins.
Nevertheless, the Republican lawyer used his FACT perch to make frequent media appearances, speaking on behalf of his “organization,” and repeating conservative talking points. All the while, Whitaker was well compensated by the tax-exempt entity.
And it’s this financing that’s probably the most notable angle to the story: we have no idea who or what has donated to the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust, which means we don’t know who helped pay the acting attorney general $1.2 million.
The New York Times reported, “The disclosure raised questions about who Mr. Whitaker’s financial patrons had been before he joined the Justice Department last year and whether he might have any undisclosed conflicts of interest.”









