Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., is a lot of great things. He is an astronaut and a Navy combat pilot. His parents were police officers, and his wife, Gabby Giffords, was a congresswoman severely injured by a mass shooter. Kelly is a gun owner and Second Amendment supporter who has long campaigned for reasonable gun control. He is a Democrat who somehow won not one but two statewide races for U.S. Senate in 2020 and 2022 in Arizona, where — until Kyrsten Sinema in 2018 — no Democrat had held a Senate seat for 30 years.
His résumé is impeccable, and he is likable. That’s why Kelly is now among the front–runners to be selected by Vice President Kamala Harris as her running mate.
He is successful by being middle of the road and quiet — which is perfect for a Democrat in Arizona but not for the Democratic VP candidate campaigning around the U.S.
But picking Kelly as her vice presidential running mate would be a mistake.
Kelly does not bring fire to the campaign trail. He would not fill the “attack dog” position the VP candidate traditionally holds. Kelly barely speaks to the media or the people. He is successful by being middle of the road and quiet — which is perfect for a Democrat in Arizona but not for the Democratic VP candidate campaigning around the U.S.
Kelly’s political success is based on a now-proven playbook for Democrats in Arizona. Run to the center, appeal to independents (approximately one-third of Arizona voters) and moderates, debate as infrequently as possible, limit public speaking, keep a low profile with the media, raise money and run ads. Kelly follows this playbook perfectly, and it has worked well for him. But it would not work for him as the VP candidate.
For all of his credibility, experience and substance, Kelly lacks the political charisma and fire necessary to run for national office. Even his biggest supporters acknowledge privately that Kelly is not a great orator or debater. No one attends a Mark Kelly speech or event and walks away talking about his passion or persuasiveness.
He is extremely accomplished, a proven leader able to handle the intense stress of combat and commanding two space flights. He probably would be a solid vice president, but he would not help Kamala Harris win the presidency.
Harris needs a partner in this race who can bring people to their feet. Who can excite Democrats around the country. Who can publicly push back with power and clarity when Donald Trump or JD Vance make outlandish claims — or outright lie. Kelly is not that guy.
There are barely more than 100 days to the election and a lot to overcome. This fight requires two strong retail politicians. Kelly’s political skills are moderation and discipline, but those skills are not what is needed in a fast-paced national campaign against Trump’s lies, attacks and threats.
Mark Kelly is a great man and a great senator, but he is not the person for this moment.
Can Kelly transform himself into an aggressive politician? Perhaps he has suppressed that part of him in his two Senate races. Maybe he could, indeed, be the political attack dog needed at this moment. He is a combat pilot, after all.









