UPDATE (May 16, 2025, 12:45 p.m. ET): The House Budget Committee failed to advance the GOP’s mega-bill on Friday morning after five Republican hardliners voted against it for not cutting spending fast enough.
Friday is going to be a tough day for House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington, R-Texas. For the past few weeks, his fellow committee chairs have been passing along the various components that will form the legislative backbone to President Donald Trump’s agenda and extend the 2017 tax cuts due to expire next year. It’s up to Arrington’s committee to pull those assorted pieces together into one coherent bill that will be able to pass the House — and the odds aren’t exactly stacked in his favor.
All the House committees have filled in the blanks now, passing their final works on to Arrington to assemble.
Arrington’s first attempt at passing a budget framework to fit Trump’s demand for “one big, beautiful bill” hit a roadblock in February when the Senate balked at the deep spending cuts it required. It took another two months of work before the two chambers settled on a joint budget reconciliation bill that would let them move forward on a party-line basis, freezing Democrats out of the process. The framework that passed provided instructions to the relevant congressional committees on how much they should spend and cut from the programs under their purview, leaving the details to the chairs to work out.
All the House committees have filled in the blanks now, passing their final works on to Arrington to assemble. While the bills in question may have passed each panel, the sum will prove to be more challenging than its parts. Namely because, as I’ve noted before, there are different factions within the House GOP with different priorities for the final bill, some of which are diametrically opposed to each other.
The most vocal wing are the blue state Republicans who want a bigger deduction for state and local taxes, known as SALT, included in the Ways and Means Committee’s section of the package. Five of them have dug in their heels, calling the increased $30,000 cap included in the bill a nonstarter. As a reminder, if all members are present, it will only take four Republicans voting against the bill to tank it, given united Democratic opposition.
Less cohesive are the GOP members concerned about the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s proposed cuts. More than a dozen House Republicans want to keep the clean energy credits that the bill nixes, which have been a boon in many of their districts. There are similar concerns about the Agriculture Committee’s plans to shift costs for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to the states, which could see either massive holes blown in state budgets or hundreds of thousands removed from the program.








