The media outlet NOTUS recently published a roundup of several prominent Republican senators’ takes on mega-billionaire Elon Musk’s extraordinary, legally questionable efforts to radically reshape the federal workforce. It documents a troubling new dynamic: Many GOP lawmakers are not only deferential to President Donald Trump, but also to his new shadow president.
We knew ahead of Trump’s second term that Republican lawmakers would likely be deferential to his wishes. What we didn’t know is they’d be deferential to Musk’s wishes.
“He’s doing exactly what he should be doing,” Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., told NOTUS. “He’s going through every agency and looking at how to make sure the money’s spent right.”
Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., agrees with Musk’s efforts to shutter USAID, telling NOTUS, “The actions that have been taken with USAID are long overdue.” Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., speaking of USAID, said “they need to be accountable.”
According to NOTUS, Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., is OK with the way Musk is operating despite its apparent illegality:
Tillis, even acknowledged that what Musk is doing is unconstitutional — but “nobody should bellyache about that.” “That runs afoul of the Constitution in the strictest sense,” Tillis said. But “it’s not uncommon for presidents to flex a little bit on where they can spend and where they can stop spending.”
While NOTUS quoted a few Republican senators with reservations, their complaints were narrow. For example Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said she was “very concerned about Mr. Musk or any of his assistants going into federal agencies and demanding personal information on employees.” Collins is already a relatively moderate outlier in the GOP caucus, and her comments hardly marked a wholesale rejection of Musk’s explosive debut in Washington.
The report makes for bleak reading. We knew ahead of Trump’s second term that Republican lawmakers would likely be deferential to his wishes. What we didn’t know is they’d be deferential to Musk’s wishes.









