Heading into Tuesday, there was an expectation that the election results might highlight a growing gulf within the Democratic Party between moderates from purple states and progressives from deep-blue cities.
Instead, the party is emerging from a cascade of victories that likely will, for a time, paper over whatever differences exist within the party.
“Our assignment everywhere is to send the strongest fighters for the working class wherever possible,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., told MSNBC on Tuesday night. “In some places — like Virginia, for the gubernatorial seat — that’s going to look like Abigail Spanberger. In New York City, unequivocally, it’s Zohran Mamdani.”
In the afterglow of Tuesday’s elections, Democrats find themselves emboldened. And the triumphant results offer something of a “choose your own adventure” feel.
In the afterglow of Tuesday’s elections, Democrats find themselves emboldened. And the triumphant results offer something of a “choose your own adventure” feel: Everyone across the ideological breadth of the party has reason to feel that their particular electoral approach has been validated.
And that may ultimately forestall the party’s looming ideological intraparty battle.
To supporters of Mamdani, the success of his mayoral bid — buoyed by record high turnout numbers — demonstrated the fundamental core of the democratic socialist’s message: Democrats can win elections by providing ambitious policy proposals around affordability, even if enacting those policies may later prove to be a challenge — an idea Mamdani explicitly endorsed.
“We won because New Yorkers allowed themselves to hope that the impossible could be made possible,” Mamdani said during his victory speech Tuesday night. “This will be an age where New Yorkers expect from their leaders a bold vision of what we will achieve, rather than a list of excuses for what we are too timid to attack.”
Kirsten Allen, a Democratic strategist who’s worked on three presidential campaigns, suggested adaptability, perhaps more than affordability, should be the party’s primary takeaway.
“Democrats secured key victories because each candidate ran a race that reflected and excited their electorate,” Allen told MSNBC. “What propelled Gov.-elect Spanberger to victory in Virginia may not have worked for Mayor-elect Mamdani — and that’s the mark of smart, disciplined campaigning.”
Indeed, if Mamdani’s success was partly fueled by big, bold policy ideas, Spanberger’s victory came from unadulterated pragmatism.
“We sent a message to the whole world that in 2025, Virginia chose pragmatism over partisanship,” Spanberger said during her own victory speech. “We turned that page by listening to our neighbors, focusing on practical results, laying out a clear agenda and leading with decency and determination.”
Democrats nationwide agree that a narrow focus on affordability — a departure from the Biden-era focus on the “soul of the nation” — powered the party’s marquee victories, which included Spanberger, Mamdani and Mikie Sherrill’s gubernatorial win in New Jersey.
Exit polling reinforces that idea. Majorities of voters in all three states cited the economy and cost of living as the most important issues facing their respective states. According to NBC exit polling data, 56% of voters in New York City said the cost of living was their most important issue. In New Jersey’s gubernatorial race, 36% of voters said taxes were the most important issue, followed closely by the economy, at 34%. The economy was also the top concern for 48% of voters in Virginia.









