DENVER, Colo. — Latino voters saved Colorado Democrats in a tough year before and now Senator Mark Udall is counting on them to do the same again in his race against Republican Cory Gardner. Some leaders in the community, however, are worried that the effort is too little, too late, after a campaign that has largely focused on reproductive rights.
On Monday, the incumbent kicked off his final day of campaigning at Metropolitan State University, where dozens of supporters waved “Latinos Con Udall” signs and chanted the candidate’s name.
%22It%27s%20amazing%20how%20he%20goes%20around%20saying%20he%E2%80%99s%20bipartisan.%20He%20doesn%E2%80%99t%20have%20a%20bipartisan%20bone%20in%20his%20body.%22′
“We are all Americans!” Udall said. “Todos somos Americanos!”
The main topic for the speakers, which included a DREAMer student, former senator and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, Illinois Congressman Luis Gutierrez, and Senator Michael Bennet, was immigration reform.
“Let’s make tomorrow a statement that this state and this country is going to move forward and embrace all of its citizens,” Udall said.
Here they had a clear case to make to Latino voters concerned about the issue: Udall supported the Senate’s bipartisan immigration bill while House Republicans killed it, then voted to deport DREAMers. Gardner stuck to the standard conservative line on immigration for years before tacking to the center more recently, but he’s still avoided taking a decisive stance on the issue. How could you possibly reward the GOP with a victory after that?
“They don’t want to have anything like immigration reform, they don’t want the DREAMers to be able to achieve their dreams and that’s really what’s at stake in this election,” Salazar said.
The question among some of Udall’s supporters there, however, was whether Latino voters in the state had actually heard that message.
Val Vigil, who joined Udall at the rally, used to serve in the state legislature with Gardner. When Vigil introduced DREAM Act legislation that would grant in-state tuition to undocumented students, Gardner took the other side, warning that it would “reward illegal behavior” in one hearing.
“He opposed it every step of the way,” Vigil said. “It’s amazing how he goes around saying he’s bipartisan. He doesn’t have a bipartisan bone in his body.”
As both campaigns agree, immigration is hardly the only issue on Latino voters’ minds. Vigil is worried, however, that voters hadn’t seen this part of Gardner’s record highlighted enough. Since his days in the legislature, the congressman has carefully adjusted his tone on immigration, rejecting the Senate’s immigration bill but promising to lead the charge for a still-unidentified alternative that satisfied all sides.
“I don’t think Udall’s called him out on his record and he should,” Vigil said. “We’re doing it on the ground, but not in media.”
Bennet, now the leader of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, knows how important Hispanic support is to the party. He won 80% of the Latino vote in his upset 2010 victory over Ken Buck, who was dragged down by his hardline stance on immigration enforcement. Bennet’s performance was so impressive that the Democrats’ massive turnout apparatus this year is named the Bannock Street project, after the Denver street that hosted his campaign offices that year.
%22The%20contrast%20is%20so%20stark%20between%20the%20two%20candidates%20%E2%80%A6%20I%20think%20the%20people%20here%20understand%20there%E2%80%99s%20an%20enormous%20difference.%22′
Asked about complaints from supporters like Vigil that immigration had gotten comparatively short shrift this year, Bennet suggested that Gardner’s opposition to immigration reform was so well known that Democrats hardly needed ads to repeat the message.
“The contrast is so stark between the two candidates on the issue of immigration reform … I think the people here understand there’s an enormous difference,” Bennet told msnbc. “You may be right that it hasn’t been litigated that much, but the distinction could not be clearer.”
In a memo, Udall campaign manager Adam Dunstone told reporters on Monday that the race was a “dead heat,” but that they expected their ground game to pull it out in part because of what they believe is a strong performance with Latino voters. “According to our modeling, Latinos already make up the same share of the electorate that they did in 2010 — and their percentage of the electorate will continue to grow.,” Dunstone wrote. “When all is said and done, Latinos will make up an even larger share of the electorate than they did in 2010.”
A spokesman for Udall’s campaign, Chris Harris, also pushed back against the idea they had ceded ground with Latinos to Gardner, noting that Udall had gone after his opponent on immigration in debates, broke with Obama in opposing a delay to executive action, and offered dozens of interviews to Spanish media. Like Bennet, Harris said immigration was left out of ads primarily because voters “know he’s a huge ally for immigrants,” allowing them to focus on other topics like veterans care and education instead.
The ground warriors getting out the Latino vote this year are less confident that’s the case. Patty Kupfer, managing director of America’s Voice, who has spent months leading an ambitious street-by-street program to turn out Latinos, told msnbc that she’d heard the Udall campaign’s explanation for its lack of immigration-focused ads. Based on what she’d seen, however, Latino voters were not automatically ready to assume Gardner is anti-immigrant, especially while the congressman bills himself as an ally of Latinos.
PHOTO ESSAY: Voters, young and old, take to polls
“The fact that there are people out there who don’t really know what Gardner stands for on immigration is a problem,” Kupfer said. “The whole strategy of the Gardner campaign has been to cover up his record and to use nice talk around immigrants and Latinos. The Udall campaign has not stepped up to counter that.”









