Women long ago shattered the glass ceiling in the diplomatic world, but is the mother of all international organizations — the United Nations — ready for a female leader?
The answer to that question likely won’t become clear until shortly before the end of the year, when South Korea’s Ban Ki-Moon, 71, is scheduled to step down as secretary-general after completing his second term.
But a strong push is underway to appoint a woman to replace him, with proponents saying that selecting the U.N.’s first female secretary-general would send a message of equality that would be heard around the globe.
“For women around the world it would be such a wonderful symbol, the empowerment of women would take a huge step forward,” said Jean Krasno, a professor at City College of New York’s Colin Powell School and chair of The Campaign to Elect a Woman U.N. Secretary General.
The U.N.’s executive body — the Security Council — holds the keys to the secretary-general’s office, as it is responsible under the U.N. charter for recommending a candidate to the General Assembly, which then votes to “appoint” the new executive. That means the U.S. and Russia, in particular, can be expected to exert considerable influence and pressure in the months remaining before the council makes its recommendation, a process that is expected to begin in late July and conclude by early September.
That led to creation of a process by which members can nominate candidates and could significantly change what has historically been a process decided in “always secretive meetings in the back rooms with the permanent members,” said Krasno, who also teaches classes on the U.N. at Yale and Columbia universities.
The idea that the time is right for a woman to lead the U.N. has significant backing in many quarters, and no organized opposition has yet appeared.
A letter sent to permanent representatives of the U.N.’s 193 General Assembly members in December specifically recommended nominations of candidates of both genders.
#She4SG #WomanoftheWeek @IrinaBokova, Director-General @UNESCO and nom by Bulgaria for #UNSG https://t.co/2nVQOmnZW6 pic.twitter.com/iiQ4nWZI4O
— Woman SG Campaign (@She4SG) February 15, 2016
So far there are seven official candidates, including three women — former Macedonian Foreign Minister Srgjan Kerim; former Croatian Foreign Minister Vesna Pusic; Montenegrin Foreign Minister Igor Luksic; former Slovenian President Danilo Turk; UNESCO Director General Irina Bokova of Bulgaria; former Moldovan Foreign Minister Natalia Gherman; and former U.N. High Commissioner of Refugees Antonio Guterres of Portugal.
But there is no formal deadline for nominations, and some observers say late entries — possibly someone with the stature of Helen Clark, U.N. Development Program administrator and former New Zealand prime minister — could significantly alter the race.
Helen Clark speaks out on #LGBTIRights on #ZeroDiscrimination Day: https://t.co/XrsI9RxvMs
— UN Development (@UNDP) March 1, 2016
Russia’s Ambassador to the U.N., Vitaly Churkin, already has made clear that Moscow believes the practice should continue, saying in September that it supports “an Eastern European woman for secretary-general.”
But Thomas Pickering, who served as U.S. ambassador to the U.N. under President George H.W. Bush, said there is growing resistance to the notion of rotation.
“There are a number of people who believe, including me, that regional rotation is basically an artifact of the past rather than something that’s important for the future,” he said. “… The secretary general is supposed to represent all the regions of all the people of the world and act in a way that’s above regional proclivities or sectional or ideological proclivities.”
"I will keep pushing until the world has NO parliaments and NO cabinets with NO women,” #UNSG Ban Ki-Moon at #csw60 pic.twitter.com/lgiZXlQaOu
— The UN Times (@TheUNTimes) March 15, 2016
“The importance of women in diplomacy has been very important to this administration and to this administration’s work at the United Nations,” she said.
Krasno, the City College of New York professor, said the historic timing also is right.
“Maybe 10 or 20 years ago, it may not have worked because women around the world needed time to build on their empowerment to the point where they are ready to lead,” she said. “But it can no longer be argued that there are no qualified women. We have chancellors, prime ministers. … There are so many talented people to choose from.”









