MANCHESTER, New Hampshire – Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders were ready to make peace and move on to other issues Saturday after a data breach that upended the Democratic presidential primary 24 hours earlier threatened to overshadow the final debate of the year.
But the swift resolution of that issue didn’t keep sparks from flying as the top contenders for their party’s nomination clashed on regime change, gun control and more.
Clinton was commanding, regaining her stature as a formidable debater after a wobblier outing last month in Iowa. While generally gearing her remarks toward a general election contest with Republicans — stressing experience and electability — the former secretary of state came prepared with opposition research she deployed with aplomb against Sanders and Martin O’Malley when needed.
Sanders turned in his strongest debate performance yet, alternating between both anger and wry humor when appropriate, and ably laying out the substantive differences between himself and Clinton as he presented himself as the conscience of the progressive movement.
For O’Malley, a long shot mired in the single digits in polls, desperate times called for desperate measures. The former Maryland governor refused to let any second go to waste as he doggedly tried to create a breakout moment and knock some paint off the leaders. He repeatedly interjected himself between Clinton and Sanders, taking tough shots and both, and he sparred with moderators.
Sanders made his most aggressive case to date against Clinton’s more hawkish foreign policy, a key vulnerability of her 2008 presidential campaign, when her vote for the Iraq War drove liberals to rival Barack Obama. “Our differences are fairly deep,” Sanders said. “And I say this with due respect, but I worry that Secretary Clinton is too much into regime change and a little bit too aggressive without knowing what the unintended consequences might be.”
The test case on their philosophical difference is Syria, where Sanders said ISIS should be the focus over removing dictator Bashar al Assad from power. “We have got to get our foreign policies and our priorities right,” he said, noting that it’s ISIS attacking the United States and France, and blowing up jetliners — not Assad.
Clinton fired back with a ready bit of data: “With all due respect, Sen. Sanders, you voted for regime change with respect to Libya,” she said.
Who should love Hillary Clinton? ‘Everybody should’every
Drawing on her four years as America’s top diplomat, Clinton suggested Sanders wasn’t being realistic. “When we look at these complex problems I wish it could be either,” she said.
Guns once again became a flashpoint between Clinton and Sanders, as they have throughout the campaign. It’s one of the few places where Clinton can outflank Sanders on his left, and she highlighted their differences with a backhanded compliment. “I am glad Sen. Sanders has really moved,” he said, once again recalling his past votes against gun control issues like the Brady handgun bill.
Even as he reiterated his call for new gun laws, Sanders said we live “in a country in which people chose to buy guns,” noting it was a “right.”
“It’s a divided country on guns,” he said, adding that he hoped to bridge the divide.
Throughout the debate, the candidates played to type. Clinton portrayed herself as a contender acceptable to everyone, while Sanders played to his base. Should corporate America love Hillary Clinton? moderator David Muir asked. “Everybody should,” she replied. “I want to be the candidate for the struggling, the striving and the successful.”
As for Sanders, would corporate America like him in the White House? “No, they won’t,” he said with a wry smile.









