After fighting each other across 38 primaries and caucuses from Maine to American Samoa, Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders have stumbled across a new conundrum in Tuesday’s primaries: Other Democrats in the midst of their own heated contests at the same time.
When voters in Maryland and Pennsylvania head to the polls Tuesday to weigh in on the presidential primary, they’ll also be picking a winner in two of the Democratic Party’s most contentious Senate primaries in the country.
The contests have presented new and unique challenges for both candidates and their allies, who have had to tread carefully through both states in order to avoid alienating voters or interest groups aligned with either candidate.
Maryland in particular has become a political minefield. It has not only the most divisive Democratic Senate primary in country, but two congressional primaries — including one where a self-funding candidate has spent an unheard of $12 million — and a fractured mayoral race in Baltimore, the state’s largest city.
“This is a time when you just try to love everyone,” said Parris Glendening, the former governor of Maryland, on how the presidential candidates have navigated the state’s tricky political waters.
The Senate race, between Reps. Chris Van Hollen and Donna Edwards, has often been compared to the presidential primary. Van Hollen, with his establishment backing, is seen as a Clinton analog while Edwards, with her progressive outsider message, is seen as Sanders.
RELATED: This Senate race could make history
But in fact, the race is a jumbled Gordian knot of interest groups and demographic and ideological factions that would be impossible for Clinton or Sanders.
Edwards, who is black, may have Sanders’ agenda, but she has Clinton’s base: African-Americans and women. And while Van Hollen sounds like Clinton as he touts his effectiveness and experience in the closing days of the trail, his support base is white liberals, much more akin to Sanders’.
While Edwards has the backing of liberal groups like Democracy for America, which endorsed Sanders, she also the support of Emily’s List, one of Clinton’s staunchest allies, which has spent close to $3 million on her behalf.
Van Hollen has some key union backers like SEIU, which has endorsed Clinton, and is also seen as having the tacit support of the White House.
“Everyone is being viciously agnostic in this one because they know what a hotbed it is,” said one Democratic operative close to the race, who spoke on the condition of anonymity given the sensitivity of the race.
Both Edwards and Van Hollen have endorsed Clinton, but she has not done or said anything that could even be misconstrued as an endorsement. Some Clinton surrogates have even steered clear of Maryland to avoid unhelpful attention.
But the former secretary of state’s efforts to win Maryland may have the unintended consequences of helping to mobilize Edwards’ voters, since both are counting on strong showings from black women.
“It’s definitely going to work in her favor, but not so overwhelmingly that large turnout will be too destructive,” said Glendening, who supports Van Hollen. “On the other hand, the Sanders campaign tends to turnout the millennials. They naturally are gravitating towards Chris Van Hollen.”
Polling is limited, but it suggests young people are actually breaking for Edwards.
It’s the first year in recent memory that the Senate primary has fallen on the same day as the presidential primary — and a rare year when Maryland’s presidential primary actually matters, noted Kevin Walling, a Maryland Democratic strategist, raising the stakes even higher.
Meanwhile, in Pennsylvania, virtually every major Democratic interest group, along with President Obama and Vice President Biden, have lined up behind Katie McGinty, a former state official. But she’s trailing Joe Sestak, a former admiral and congressman.
Pro-McGinty forces have grumbled that Clinton has decided to sit this one out, especially since it’s so close that any little thing might be enough to put McGinty over the top. And unlike Maryland, the party is more or less united in its pick.









