The U.S. House of Representatives voted Wednesday afternoon to approve President Obama’s request to train and equip moderate Syrian rebels to fight the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, passing the measure by a bipartisan vote of 273-156.
The measure, an amendment to the Continuing Resolution (CR) that keeps the government funded until Dec. 11, now heads to the Senate, which could vote to authorize Obama’s proposal as soon as Thursday.
Earlier on Wednesday, Obama delivered an impassioned, pep rally-like speech to military personnel in Florida, where the president insisted again that the U.S. will not send ground troops to fight ISIS.
“I will not commit you and the rest of our forces to fighting another ground war in Iraq,” the commander-in-chief said at MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa, Fla. Earlier in the day, Obama was briefed on battle plans to strike ISIS in Iraq and possibly Syria by military commanders at U.S. Central Command.
Obama’s remarks come hours before the House of Representatives is expected to vote on his plan to arm and train moderate Syrian rebels to fight ISIS, also known as ISIL. They also come on the heels of an acknowledgement by Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, that sending ground troops into Iraq isn’t completely out of the question.
The White House responded to Dempsey’s testimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee by saying Dempsey was simply doing his job by providing a wide range of options for the president and there are no intentions for any U.S. ground troops to participate.
Obama, in Florida, also insisted that “this is not and will not be America’s fight alone.” He said, “After a decade of massive ground deployments, it is more effective to use our unique capabilities in support of partners on the ground so they can secure their own countries’ futures.”
%22This%20is%20not%20and%20will%20not%20be%20America%E2%80%99s%20fight%20alone.%22′
White House officials have said that “several” Arab countries have committed to carrying out airstrikes against ISIS, although officials would not identify which countries extended the offer.
On Wednesday afternoon, Secretary of State John Kerry reiterated Obama’s declaration that U.S. troops deployed to Iraq will not have a combat mission there. He also spoke directly to a group of anti-war, Code Pink protesters who showed up to the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee hearing.
“I understand dissent. I’ve lived it. That’s how I first testified in front of this country in 1971,” said Kerry, referring to his testimony before the same committee as a leader of the Vietnam Veterans Against the War group. “… I respect the right of Code Pink to protest and use that right. But, you know what? I also know something about Code Pink. Code Pink was started by a woman and women who are opposed to war but who also thought the government’s job was to take care of people and to give them health care and education and good jobs. And if that’s what you believe in, and I believe it is, you ought to care about fighting ISIL. Because ISIL is killing and raping and mutilating women.”
Meanwhile, lawmakers continued their debate on arming Syrian rebels with both Democrats and Republicans sounding the alarm.
During a heated speech Wednesday on the Senate floor, Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia described Obama’s strategy as “insanity.”
“The first principle of war is to know your enemy,” he said. “… It is equally important to know our allies and I am not confident we know who our allies are.” Manchin said he’s in favor of the recent U.S. airstrikes but prefers neighboring countries use their forces rather than arming the rebels.
“We have been at war in that part of the world for the last 13 years. If money and military might could make a difference, it would have by now,” added Manchin.








