Jeb Bush, once eager to prove “I am my own man,” is rapidly becoming a family man.
During last week’s debate, Bush vigorously defended his brother against Donald Trump’s attacks on the Iraq War, a 180 from just months ago when he struggled to distance himself from brother George W. Bush’s record in Iraq.
“As it relates to my brother, there is one thing I know for sure: He kept us safe,” Bush declared, prompting a huge round of applause from the audience.
RELATED: Jeb leaves ‘I’m my own man’ behind
Days later, at the Mackinac Republican Leadership Conference in Michigan, Bush again bear-hugged his family dynasty when declaring that the U.S. needs to improve its relationship with Israel and Canada.
“I know how to do this because, yes, I am a Bush. I happen to have seen two really good presidents develop relationships with other countries.”
It’s a significant reversal from the start of his campaign, when Bush took pains to distance himself from his father and brother while pundits wondered whether the Bush name and baggage would weigh him down.
Bush allies say it reflects a confidence that the candidate has successfully begun to establish his own identity, and so can embrace some of the advantages of being a Bush.
“Jeb and the campaign feel more comfortable that the Jeb identity is coming across and people are getting to know better where he stands, so the separation between Jeb and family is not as important as it once was,” said Al Cardenas, a GOP lobbyist and longtime Bush family friend.
After three months of active campaigning, the rollout of a half-dozen unique policy proposals and innumerable television interviews, Bush’s advisers believe Jeb has started to prove he’s his own man. Bush has made a point of drawing a contrast with his brother and father on some key policy issues, particularly those important to conservatives, like government spending and judicial nominees.
Bush has said government spending during his brother’s time in the White House could’ve been “more disciplined,” and has called for a balanced budget amendment and presidential line-item veto power as reforms. He’s also criticized past presidents — not by name, but the implication is clear — for picking Supreme Court nominees “that don’t have a proven record,” and ultimately prove to be insufficiently committed to conservative principles on the bench.
RELATED: Jeb Bush on Obama: ‘His problem is he’s a progressive liberal’








