Democratic lawmakers and groups advocating for government transparency are sounding alarm bells following Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker’s decision to greenlight legislation to ax secret investigations into political corruption – similar to probes that have continuously dogged the Republican in recent years.
The move comes shortly after Walker – once considered a top presidential contender – surprisingly pulled the plug on his campaign in September after failing to amass both support and cash. With his 2016 dreams dashed, some critics are going as far to suggest Walker is on a political payback mission against critics in his home state. The New York Times editorial board on Tuesday described his latest actions as “The Revenge of Scott Walker.”
The bill Walker signed on Friday blocks prosecutors from using the state’s so-called “John Doe” law to investigate political misconduct, including campaign finance violations and bribes. John Does operate like a grand jury proceeding, where witnesses may be subpoenaed and a judge instead of jurors decides if there is enough evidence to merit an indictment. Proponents say it will now be harder to investigate politicians for political abuses. Walker has argued the move was done to protect free speech.
RELATED: Scott Walker ‘just wasn’t prepared’
Walker himself has been part of two John Doe investigations, although he was never charged. One which began in 2010 resulted in six of his aides being convicted and another, which started in 2012, looked into coordination between conservative political organizations and Walker during his recall election.
Jay Heck, executive director of Common Cause Wisconsin, a non-partisan group that advocates for clean and accountable government, took issue with the notion that Walker was trying to exact some type of revenge in the aftermath of his failed presidential campaign, as such legislation was already underway. But he said either way latest development is bad news for democracy.
“Wisconsin which used to be considered a model for the nation in terms of good clean government and transparency,” said Heck. “All the unique features that used to make Wisconsin a model — Republicans have stripped that away.”
It’s not just the John Doe laws that are causing major concerns. While the governor has been away on the campaign trail, the Republican-led legislature has pushed bills to chip away at independent oversight of elections and campaign finance laws.
One bill up in the state Senate would dismantle Wisconsin’s Government Accountability Board, a nonpartisan agency tasked with elections and government ethics oversight. It would be replaced with a distinctly partisan model, allowing an equal number of Republican and Democratic appointees to enforce the state’s campaign finance, lobbying and ethics laws. Another bill would effectively re-write campaign finance laws, doubling the amount that donors could contribute to candidates’ campaigns and open the floodgates to the amount of cash given to political parties and campaign committees.









