The Democratic National Committee (DNC) has chosen three cities as finalists to host the party’s next presidential nominating event in 2016: New York City, Philadelphia, and Columbus, Ohio.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz, chair of the DNC, made the decision public on Monday, following a round of site visits to five locations. The DNC organizes the quadrennial event.
RELATED: DNC fundraising exceeded RNC’s in June
“We are fortunate to have such a diverse and vibrant group of cities interested in hosting this special event and we thank Phoenix and Birmingham for showcasing their special communities. We look forward to working with Columbus, New York, and Philadelphia as we go forward,” she wrote in a statement.
She included three dates under consideration for the event: The weeks of July 18, July 25, and Aug. 22. The Democrats are expected to make a final decision by early next year.
New York, along with five other cities — Columbus, Cleveland, Philadelphia, Phoenix and Birmingham, Alabama — submitted bids earlier this year to host the 2016 DNC. New York City appears to be the outlier, though, because of the Empire State’s consistently blue voting record.
In July, the Republican National Committee selected Cleveland as the site for its 2016 convention. The city, located in the swing state of Ohio, beat Dallas as the host city for the GOP’s presidential nominating event.
The finalists have long been expected among watchers and Democratic insiders, who said Birmingham and Phoenix couldn’t raise the necessary funds.
“Symbolism matters, but it’s about third or fourth place. First is money. The second issue infrastructure. How many taxi cabs do they have? How easy is it to get to the hotels and back? How fast can you build out the convention? Those are all the things that matter,” former DNC Chairman Howard Dean, who oversaw Denver’s selection for the 2008 convention, told msnbc. “The most important thing is: Do you have confidence in the host committee to be able to run this convention?”
During the 2012 convention in Charlotte — which cost more than $42 million — the party had to scramble and cancel events when the host committee fell more than $25 million behind in their fundraising efforts. After that experience, the DNC is especially wary about getting burned again when it comes to money.
RELATED: DNC orders ‘top-to-bottom’ election review
“People get wrapped up in the symbolism, but this is primarily a business decision that will be based on logistics, finances and security,” DNC spokesperson Lily Adams told msnbc.
With that in mind, each of the three cities has its advantages and disadvantages, Democrats say.
New York City is the clear winner on finances. Its massive 101-member host committee, which includes Wall Street titans like JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon and Goldman Sachs head Lloyd Blankfein, already raised $10 million in pledges and secured promises to raise $100 million or more.
“New York is our biggest competition … they got a little deeper pockets than we do,” Rep. Bob Brady, who represents Philadelphia and chairs the city’s Democratic Party, told msnbc last month.
Logistically, however, New York’s convention bid is complicated by the fact that most of the city’s hotels are in Manhattan, while the main event would take place at Barclays Center in Brooklyn.









