It has been six months since Michael Brown Jr. was shot and killed by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, but the deep racial and social divides exposed by his killing continue to ripple throughout the region.
Businesses that were damaged during the riots that gripped the city after a grand jury announced that it would not indict the officer who killed Brown are slowly being rebuilt and reopened. Protesters continue to demand police accountability for the killings of unarmed African-Americans. And the state legislature is currently wrestling with a slew of legislation with roots that wind back to last summer’s tumult in Ferguson.
And now, a group of legal and advocacy groups are taking steps to remedy what they describe as a regional criminal justice issue that helped wrench open the racial divide that came to light in the wake of Brown’s death.
Following Brown’s killing in August by now-retired Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson, local residents and some elected officials zeroed in on what they say has been a long and torrid history of police abuses. The claims ranged from outright police brutality to day-to-day harassment and unfair stops-and-searches of poor and minority residents. Lawyers and activists said the latter is part of a much broader, systemic pattern across the web of more than 80 small independent municipalities in the suburbs of St. Louis that use petty arrests and exorbitant fines to fill city coffers.
On Sunday, plaintiffs in two separate cases filed federal class action lawsuits against Ferguson and another nearby municipality, Jennings, over what they allege are municipal court systems that essentially operate as modern-day debtors’ prisons, targeting poor African-Americans for arrest and incarceration.
WATCH: Ferguson officer won’t face charges for deadly shooting
The 11 plaintiffs in the suit against Ferguson were jailed for non-payment and claim they were held indefinitely without attorneys and never given hearings to determine their ability to pay fines and fees. The suit against Jennings claims the nine plaintiffs were held in jail to coerce them into paying their fines. The Jennings group also alleges that police and jailers arbitrarily changed the amounts they owed.
All of the plaintiffs are poor or homeless and have been jailed for weeks or months because of their inability to pay fines for low-level offenses, according to attorneys who filed the respective suits on their behalf.
Both suits were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. Plaintiffs in both suits are represented by attorneys with the Washington-based non-profit organization Equal Justice Under Law; ArchCity Defenders, a nonprofit organization serving the homeless and working poor; and the Saint Louis University School of Law Legal Clinics.
The lawyers say their clients represent just a sampling of those targeted by the debtors’ prison scheme, kept in filthy, inhumane conditions. According to the lawsuit, at least four residents who were jailed and “unable to pay for their freedom” committed suicide in the past five months.
“These suits are another step in making the public aware of the abuses which result from for-profit policing and illegal practices in many municipal courts,” said Brendan Roediger, a professor with St. Louis University School of Law’s legal clinic. “When cities operate their police departments and municipal courts for profit, they ignore constitutional protections for defendants and jail them in squalid conditions in the hope those defendants will beg relatives and friends to pay their fines to obtain their release.”
The lawsuits also claim that the scheme is a money-making machine for Ferguson and Jennings, with millions made in arrests between the two municipalities. Ferguson has averaged 3.6 arrest warrants for every household and Jennings 2.1 arrest warrants for every household in recent years, mostly in cases involving old, unpaid debts.
Reached by email, Cheryl Balke, the city clerk of Jennings said that the city would not be commenting on the lawsuit at this time.
In a lengthy statement released Monday evening, the city of Ferguson said it is the city’s policy not to discuss lawsuits that are pending litigation, but that officials are reviewing the lawsuit, which it describes as “disturbing.” “We believe this lawsuit is disturbing because it contains allegations that are not based on objective facts,” said Ferguson Mayor James Knowles III. “It is our hope that the suit will be handled according to the rule of law and the rules of procedure in the federal courts, and not through the media.”








