THE NOMINEEBY ERICK ERICKSONRED STATE
The big difference between 2008 and 2012 is that in 2008, David beat Goliath. The base of the party rallied to the David who took out the machine no one thought could be taken out. In 2012, Goliath is beating David and no one ever really cheers for Goliath. … [Romney] will go into the general election deeply distrusted by his own base while having to woo independent voters. This is not a dazzling position to be in to beat an incumbent President. … Were I Mitt Romney I’d be wondering how I spent 5.5 times as much money as Rick Santorum and barely won Ohio. I’d be wondering who on my campaign staff gets fired first. … A win is a win is a win. But with each Romney win, he comes away even more badly bruised. The rest of March will be just as brutal. What a mess.
HOW GOOD IS THE HOUSING NEWS?EDITORIALNEW YORK TIMES
The main component of the administration’s new efforts is the recent foreclosure settlement between the big banks and state and federal officials. … The settlement was announced nearly a month ago, but the specific terms have yet to be released. … The longer it takes to do an investigation, the longer it will take to secure verdicts or settlements that would include money for further antiforeclosure efforts. Because the banks held off on foreclosure while the settlement was being negotiated, reclosure filings are set to rise in the coming year to more than two million. That means more pain for struggling homeowners — and the economy. By this point, homeowners should be inundated with relief, not still anxiously awaiting help.
A GOP CAMPAIGN THAT NO ONE SEEMS ABLE TO WINBY HAROLD MEYERSONWASHINGTON POST
The weakness of this year’s Republican field is chiefly a refraction of the weakness of the Republican electorate. Republicans want a candidate who channels their rage at Obama and the unfamiliar America — economically stagnant and increasingly multi-racial — over which he presides. They want a candidate who will turn the clock back to the economics, demographics and verities of an earlier — if needs be, mythic — time. These are not tasks that serious leaders embrace. In the absence of serious leaders, we have Romney, Santorum, Gingrich and Paul.
MITT ROMNEY: WINNING VOTES, NOT LOVEBY E.J. DIONNEWASHINGTON POST
It is Nixon, rival to Romney’s father in 1968, who provides the words that may best explain how Mitt Romney is managing his way toward a tepid triumph. … Nixon knew that he needed the right wing but had no illusions about how its loyalists felt about him. “They don’t like me,” Nixon said, “but they tolerate me.” That is the best Romney is likely to do with the Tea Partyers and the Christian conservatives and the Southerners who don’t cotton to formerly moderate private equity guys from New England. But as it was for Nixon, this may be enough.
ROMNEY’S INTERFERENCE ON IRANBY JOHN KERRYWASHINGTON POST








