The conversation surrounding admitted killer George Zimmerman has, from the beginning, reminded me of the riot scene near the end of Spike Lee’s 1989 masterpiece, Do the Right Thing. (Apologies for spoliers, but it has been over 20 years.) The destruction of Sal’s Famous Pizzeria, the three old guys who’ve been sitting on the corner all day start taking steps across the street, intending to do the same thing to the Korean grocery. Sonny, the grocery owner, swings a broom wildly to keep them away, screaming desperately, “I no white!”
News outlets, as they should have, took care to note from the start that Zimmerman is Latino, not “white.” His father was quickly out with the “he’s not racist!” quote, before his camp realized that there were other ways to defend Zimmerman (such as blame and shame his victim). While race has been an important factor, it’s being discussed in such tangential, and unhelpful ways.
Today, there are reports that in the seven calls Zimmerman made to Sanford, FL police since last August:
Zimmerman mentioned race only when the dispatcher asked him to specify, a fact that could bode well for the 28-year-old who has come under fire for shooting the unarmed black teenager in his gated community.
Sorry to be so blunt, but who cares? I say that even from a legal standpoint, seeing as Zimmerman is being investigated for a potential hate crime on the night of February 26, 2012 — not prior to that. This is the 911-call equivalent of the I Have a Black Friend!™ defense.
Writing in the Huffington Post last week, author Sam Sommers made a related point:
Let me be clear: this tragedy is all about race. While some politicians have suggested of late that “race shouldn’t be a factor” in discussing the case, it doesn’t take a behavioral scientist to tell you that Zimmerman would have been far less likely to view an unarmed white teen outside a convenience store as suspicious or worthy of surveillance…








