A panel charged with reviewing the military’s sexual assault response practices recommended Thursday that commanders retain their authority over prosecution decisions.
A subcommittee dedicated to investigating the role of commanders in the process found insufficient evidence from U.S. allies that sexual assault reports and prosecutions increased when commanders did not have authority to support that proposal.
“The evidence does not support a conclusion that removing such authority will increase confidence among victims of sexual assault about the fairness of the military justice system or reduce their concerns about possible reprisal for making reports of sexual assault,” Barbara Jones, the subcommittee chair said in a letter to the full committee.
The panel’s findings are a blow to Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand’s efforts to secure votes for her Military Justic Improvement Act, which would take serious crimes like sexual assault prosecutions out of the chain of command. With a vote on Gillibrand’s bill expected this month, time is running out to ensure enough supporters to ward off a potential filibuster.
Supporters of Gillibrand’s bill applauded the effort to educate the public on the intricacies of the military justice system.
“[Thursday’s] public hearing is a step toward increasing lawmakers’ and the American public’s understanding of the role of commanders,” said Service Women’s Action Network senior policy fellow Captain Lory Manning. “As a former commander, I can tell you that the responsibilities of military leadership are varied and complex…Legal decisions regarding nonmilitary-specific, felony-equivalent crimes should be made by military attorneys with the necessary legal education. Removing these decisions from military commanders does not diminish their authority— they still retain all the disciplinary tools they need to maintain good order and discipline and to accomplish their command missions.”









