It’s been one week since the Republican-led Michigan legislature passed, and Governor Rick Snyder signed, new “right-to-work” legislation. Michigan is now the 24th state with right-to-work laws. Right-to-work prohibits union dues from being a condition of employment. But is “right-to-work,” or “freedom-to-work” as it is also called, a disingenuous term?
The Washington Post‘s Ezra Klein wrote last week, “The term ‘right-to-work law’ is a triumph of framing. Such laws do not, in fact, give you the ‘right to work.’ They give you the right to refuse to pay union dues when you work for a union shop, even though you get the wages the union bargained for, and the benefits the union bargained for, and the grievance process the union bargained for.”
So how was it possible that this flawed framework led to the passage of right-to-work in a state like Michigan that is home to one of the biggest unions in the nation? Sunday in #nerdland, host Melissa Harris-Perry explored the factors that made it possible for right-to-work to pass in Michigan, including the defeat of Proposition 2 on the November ballot, an initiative that would have ingrained workers’ collective-bargaining rights into the state constitution.
When asked on MHP whether Proposition 2’s failure opened the door for right-to-work, United Auto Workers president Bob King offered some regret. “We tried to do a preemptive block of that by doing Proposition 2. We didn’t do a good enough job on Proposition 2, lot of reasons maybe.” He added that while strategically there may have been some other choices made, that “it was the right thing to do… I wish we’d won at Proposition 2. But if we didn’t do Proposition 2 we’d be sitting here right now and they’d be passing ‘right-to-work’ and we’d be saying why didn’t we try to stop this before it came down?”









