Let me finish tonight with this.
I enjoyed Cita Stelzer’s new book, Dinner with Churchill: Policy-Making at the Dinner Table. While managing the war, the British prime minister maintained an active palate, a taste for whiskey and cognac, and a nose for a fine Cuban cigar.
But the real takeaway from the book was that this so-called Man of the 20th Century was more productive at the dinner table than the conference table, and as we look to the start of the president’s second term on Monday, it’s a lesson which needs to be appreciated by modern day Washington.
That we live in polarized times is not subject to debate. Just look at the difficulty politicians had in navigating the fiscal cliff, or the looming disagreement over gun control.
One of the causes is incivility. Elected officials spend very little social time with one another. They don’t move their families and settle here anymore. They’re too busy running home to raise money.
To spur a climate where collegiality reigns will require both sides extending themselves. The president has many attributes, but this sort of socializing doesn’t appear to come to him naturally the way it did to, say, JFK or Reagan.
He disagrees. Here’s what he said when asked about the insular nature of his White House at this week’s press conference: “Most people who know me know I’m a pretty friendly guy. And I like a good party.”
Still, when he extends himself, his overtures need to be reciprocated. Last week, ABC reported that Speaker Boehner has turned down an invitation to every formal state dinner President Obama has held—six in total. And that Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell had turned down at least two. And that McConnell even declined an invitation last spring when the University of Kentucky men’s basketball team was honored at the White House for winning the national championship.









