The Republican Party’s abuse of the filibuster has made the 112th Congress one of the least productive in U.S. history. The Democrats, without anything close to a 60-seat, filibuster-proof supermajority, simply can’t get much done.
Now, Senate Dems essentially want to change the rules so the Republicans have less ammunition to stall legislative business. But while filibuster reform would ease gridlock, it could also hurt the Dems in the future when they inevitably become the minority party again some day. Still, in the long run, making it easier to pass legislation is likely to favor the party that takes a more activist approach to government: the Democrats.
Here are five signs that change is likely on the way.
1. Harry Reid says soSenate Majority Leader Harry Reid is making a big push to change the rules. He wants to prohibit filibusters at the start of debates, shorten the time required to break a filibuster, and mandate that whoever is filibustering must actually speak on the floor. On Tuesday, Reid said the GOP has made the Senate “dysfunctional” and that “I have asked my caucus to support simple changes.”
2. A “nuclear option” is on the table
Some lawmakers are also reportedly considering a “nuclear option” that would call for a simple majority, or 51 votes, to change the Senate rules in January. Now, two-thirds, or 67 votes are required. Under the rules, the Senate can, on the first day of a new session, change its rules by a majority vote. Of course, doing so might set a worrying precedent that Dems would come to regret.









