America’s homeless population has been declining for years. But local laws targeting the homeless—prohibiting them from panhandling, camping outside and sleeping in their vehicles—have been on the rise, prompting lawsuits that are now winding their way through the courts.
One prominent case has emerged in Idaho, where a federal court is expected to rule this summer on a Boise anti-camping law that makes it illegal for residents to sleep in public places. The law is being challenged by a group of homeless individuals and legal advocates who argue that the ordinance is a violation of the Eighth Amendment, unconstitutionally subjecting residents to “cruel and unusual punishment” simply for fulfilling a basic human need.
RELATED: Formerly homeless women tell their stories in doc
Such laws essentially criminalize homelessness, according to Howard Belodoff of Idaho Legal Aid, one of the attorneys representing the plaintiffs.
“This criminalization doesn’t resolve problems—it just creates more problems,” said Belodoff. “There are programs, there are cities and counties that have programs that really address the issue. Boise does not—it’s window dressing.”
After the lawsuit was brought forward in 2009, the city said it would only enforce the ordinance when the local homeless shelters were full, prompting a U.S. district judge to uphold the law. But a federal appeals court then overturned the ruling in 2013.
Local governments across the country are passing similar laws targeting the homeless. Since 2011, bans on camping in public have risen by 60%; anti-begging laws have risen by 25%; and bans on sleeping in vehicles have risen by 119%, according to a 2014 report from the National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty (NLCHP), which is also representing the plaintiffs in the Boise anti-camping case.
“It seems a lot of cities who adopt these laws do so out of concern from the business community or concerns about tourism,” said Maria Foscarinis, executive director of the NLCHP. “What they’re interested in is not having visible poverty present in the city center.”
Homeless advocates have been encouraged by other recent challenges to such laws. Last year, a federal court struck down a law banning car camping in Los Angeles, finding the statute to be unconstitutionally vague. In 2014, a federal judge struck down part of a new anti-panhandling ordinance in Boise.
Boise’s mayor and police both declined to comment on the anti-camping ordinance or the ongoing lawsuit.
%22What%20they%E2%80%99re%20interested%20in%20is%20not%20having%20visible%20poverty%20present%20in%20the%20city%20center.%22′
But Mike Journee, a spokesman for the city of Boise, said that local officials are serious about tackling the problem of homelessness. Preliminary numbers from the annual point-in-time count suggest that there’s been a modest increase in the local homeless population since last year, said Journee, attributing the likely increase to a housing crunch in the area.
More than 40% of Idaho’s homeless cited unemployment as the situation that caused their homelessness, while 33% cited the inability to find affordable housing, according to the 2014 point in time survey.
RELATED: Alaska Rep. Don Young: Wolves could solve your ‘homeless problem’
Local officials have previously cited public safety as a major reason to enforce laws like the anti-camping ordinance. In October 2014, a 37-year-old homeless man in Boise was found dead near a long-standing homeless encampment beneath an underpass, and a local man was charged with his murder.
Police have since stepped up enforcement of the anti-camping ordinance, according to Belodoff. He acknowledges that the living conditions beneath the underpass are less than ideal, but believes that officials are wrong for linking the murder to the city’s homeless problem. “That could have happened anywhere in Boise—they tried to sensationalize it,” said Belodoff.
Rev. Bill Roscoe, who runs the Boise Rescue Mission, supports the anti-camping ordinance. “It’s absolutely detrimental to business—it’s detrimental to public safety,” he said. “That kind of scene attracts people who have less than the best interests of the community in mind,” Roscoe added, noting the October murder and other crime in the area.









