Since Watergate, seven presidents have been elected. Six of them took office at a time in which their party enjoyed a Senate majority.
In fact, looking back over the last several generations, this has been far more common than not. Since the turn of the 20th century, only three presidents — Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, and George H.W. Bush — took office with their party in the Senate minority. And since Ford never actually won a national election, we’re really only talking about two elected presidents over the last 120 years, who didn’t have the luxury of political allies running the Senate when they entered the White House.
The last time a Democratic president took office alongside a Republican-led Senate? Grover Cleveland in 1885.
Of course, when Joe Biden takes the oath of office in 57 days, there’s a very real possibility that the streak will end and he’ll have no choice but to spend the first two years of his presidency trying to deal with a Senate led by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.). We won’t know for sure which party will control the chamber until Georgia holds its two Senate runoff elections on Jan. 5.
But in the meantime, as NBC News reported, the president-elect is getting some advice: focus less on legislation and more on executive actions.
Democratic senators are calling on President-elect Joe Biden to use executive power to advance goals such as tackling climate change, relieving student debt and creating a more progressive immigration system. The calls from senators reflect a recognition that Democratic lawmakers may not be able to pass a transformative legislative agenda after underperforming in congressional races.
This is very sound advice. First, as Donald Trump has helped demonstrate, there’s quite a bit a president can do through executive actions, and Biden should prepare to follow a similar course. Vox’s Dylan Matthews recently put together a list of “enormously consequential things Biden can do without the Senate,” and the list wasn’t exactly short.
And second, the likelihood that McConnell, if he’s the majority leader, will be willing to work with the Democratic White House in a constructive way is poor. We need only look at McConnell’s actions during Barack Obama’s presidency to get a sense of how the Kentucky Republican approaches his governing responsibilities.
As I noted in my book (see the first chapter), after Obama was inaugurated in 2009, Republicans were under some pressure to be responsible and constructive, with many pleading with GOP officials to resist the urge to slap away the Democratic president’s outstretched hand. McConnell executed a different kind of plan, refusing to even consider bipartisan governing, even when Obama agreed with his opponents.
“Public opinion can change, but it is affected by what elected officials do,” the Kentuckian told National Journal in March 2010. “Our reaction to what [Democrats] were doing had a lot to do with how the public felt about it. Republican unity in the House and Senate has been the major contributing factor to shifting American public opinion.”








