By Michael Smerconish
Let me finish tonight with this.
Yesterday, Mitt Romney was asked about his Mormon faith while on the stump. In Wisconsin, a man read to him from a book of scripture published by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, and asked Romney whether he agreed with his church’s one-time belief that interracial marriage was a sin.
Q: “Do you believe it’s a sin for a white man to marry and procreate with a black?”
Romney: “No. Next question.”
I said here last night that I think Romney has missed several opportunities to turn this campaign’s religious fixation to his advantage. This was yet another.
Given that polls show he faces prejudice among a sizable share of primary voters because of his Mormon faith, you would think Romney would be eager to try to redefine the role of faith in the election.
One opportunity came when the Obama administration attempted to force religious institutions to offer birth control coverage to their employees in contravention of church teachings. The administration exempted churches, but it should have done the same for church-related institutions from the get-go. Forget for a moment the shortsightedness of an institution that opposes abortion but fails to recognize that contraception can prevent it.
Whatever the basis of the church’s position, the government should not force it to act against its teachings. It was into this cross fire that Rick Santorum moved when he said the President was motivated by “some phony theology, not a theology based on the Bible.”
That’s when Romney should have stepped in and asked: What separates us from Iran or al-Qaeda if we are going to pick our presidents according to religious litmus tests? Perhaps he could have quoted the First Amendment and reminded people that it ensures every American’s ability to exercise his faith, or to exercise no faith. But Romney remained silent.








