On President Obama’s recent executive action to shield as many as 5 million undocumented immigrants from deportation, like so many other polarizing issues, public opinion is sharply divided.
According to a Quinnipiac University poll released on Tuesday, 45% of voters said Obama should take executive action on immigration, which he did last week, if Congress fails to act, while 48% they were against the idea.
RELATED: President Obama announces immigration action
The survey also showed that support for a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants is at its lowest level ever measured by Quinnipiac. Just under half, 48% of voters, said undocumented immigrants should be allowed to stay and be provided a path to citizenship—down from the 57% from November of last year.
Meanwhile, 35% said undocumented immigrants should be required to leave the U.S., up from the 26% a year ago. And 11% said immigrants should be allowed to stay but not be allowed to apply for citizenship. That percentage is consistent with previous surveys on the same issue.
“While President Barack Obama’s popularity wallows, support for immigrants wanes as Americans look at immigration reform with ambivalence,” said Tim Malloy, assistant director of the survey. The president’s approval rating in the poll stood at just 39%– just hovering above his lowest-ever 38% approval rating in December of last year. The survey has a margin of error of 2.4 points and was taken Nov. 18-23. Obama announced the executive action on immigration on Nov. 20.
The president announced late last week that he would defer the deportation of the parents of children who are either legal residents or U.S. citizens. He also said he would expand protection to so-called “DREAM-ers” or children who came to the country illegally with their parents. In addition, those two groups will not be prohibited from working in the U.S. legally after passing a background check. His executive actions will protect millions from deportation for three years.
Republicans immediately criticized the move, calling it constitutional overreach and “amnesty.”









