Three weeks ago today, federal prosecutors filed a superseding indictment in Donald Trump’s classified documents case, and by all appearances, it was quite devastating. In addition to all of the scandalous revelations from the first indictment, the second filing included previously unseen details about an apparent cover-up in which the former president allegedly conspired with aides to destroy evidence.
Just hours later, Sen. Josh Hawley expressed outrage — not with Trump’s alleged crimes, but with prosecutors’ willingness to hold Trump accountable for his alleged crimes. To hear the Missouri Republican tell it, an unidentified “they” were turning the rule of law “on its head” by launching an investigation, methodically collecting evidence, working with a grand jury, and bringing charges against a private citizen who appears to have committed a series of felonies.
“We cannot allow this to stand,” the senator added during his Fox News interview, failing to explain what “this” referred to.
Three weeks later, the former president was indicted once more — this time in Georgia, for alleged election interference — and Hawley again went on Fox News to complain, though the GOP lawmaker’s rhetoric was even more provocative this time around.
From the transcript of the senator’s on-air appearance:
“They’re trying to send a message, loud and clear, and the message is: Don’t mess with us. And why they’re going after Trump? Because he messed with them. He challenged them across the board. He challenged their pro-war policies. He’s challenged them on Ukraine. He’s challenged their globalist agenda. … And the message is, if you challenge them on this stuff, if you challenge them on these policies, they hold dear, they will come after you. If you challenge them on their pro-abortion religion, they will come after you.”
Highlighting Hawley’s curious rant, Meidas Touch asked in a headline, “What the hell is he talking about?”
That’s an excellent question.
If the Missouri Republican — a Yale-trained attorney and former state attorney general — wants to make the case that the former president is innocent, he’s certainly welcome to present a defense. If Hawley believes he’s found flaws in the indictments, he should use his position to highlight them.








