One of the many problems with Donald Trump’s approach to White House governance is the president’s willingness to put enormous power into the hands of his young son-in-law. Despite his inexperience and lack of subject-matter expertise, Jared Kushner has been given a vast policy portfolio, which includes key duties related to international affairs.
For some officials abroad, that’s created an opportunity of sorts. The Washington Post reported in February, for example, that officials in at least four countries — the United Arab Emirates, China, Israel, and Mexico — had “privately discussed ways they can manipulate” Kushner, exploiting, among other things, his inexperience.
The article added, “Officials in the White House were concerned that Kushner was ‘naive and being tricked’ in conversations with foreign officials, some of whom said they wanted to deal only with Kushner directly and not more experienced personnel.”
Nearly a year later, the question is whether other countries may have come to similar conclusions. Take Saudi Arabia, for example.
Senior American officials were worried. Since the early months of the Trump administration, Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and Middle East adviser, had been having private, informal conversations with Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the favorite son of Saudi Arabia’s king.
Given Mr. Kushner’s political inexperience, the private exchanges could make him susceptible to Saudi manipulation, said three former senior American officials. In an effort to tighten practices at the White House, a new chief of staff tried to reimpose longstanding procedures stipulating that National Security Council staff members should participate in all calls with foreign leaders.









